Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Peter Cehlarik Tanner Glass

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerPeter Cehlarik: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentilePeter Cehlarik: Assists, 0.18 a game, 40th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Points, 0.18 a game, 16th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Shots, 0.73 a game, 3rd percentilePeter Cehlarik: Hits, 0.64 a game, 27th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Corsi for %, 51.8%, 70th percentilePeter Cehlarik: CF% rel, -0.9, 39th percentilePeter Cehlarik: On-ice xG %, 53.8%, 80th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 23rd percentilePeter Cehlarik: Chances created, 0.57 xG per 60, 20th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Shot quality, 10.4% a shot, 97th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Finishing, -1.5 goals above expected, 39th percentileTanner Glass: Goals, 0.09 a game, 22nd percentileTanner Glass: Assists, 0.09 a game, 16th percentileTanner Glass: Points, 0.18 a game, 16th percentileTanner Glass: Shots, 0.73 a game, 3rd percentileTanner Glass: Hits, 3.36 a game, 99th percentileTanner Glass: Corsi for %, 47.7%, 25th percentileTanner Glass: CF% rel, -1.1, 36th percentileTanner Glass: On-ice xG %, 47.4%, 26th percentileTanner Glass: Rating, -0.2 goals above replacement, 21st percentileTanner Glass: Chances created, 0.85 xG per 60, 72nd percentileTanner Glass: Shot quality, 11.3% a shot, 99th percentileTanner Glass: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 46th percentile
00.511.52Peter Cehlarik 2Tanner Glass 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Peter Cehlarik
Tanner Glass

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Peter Cehlarik L, BOS 2016-17 Tanner Glass L, CGY
11 Games played 11
0 Goals 1
2 Assists 1
2 Points 2
0.18 Points per game 0.18
0 Plus/minus 0
8 Shots 8
0.0 Shooting % 12.5
7 Hits 37
0 Penalty minutes 17
13:55 Average ice time 10:55
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.8 Corsi for % 47.7
-0.9 CF% relative to team -1.1
54.1 Fenwick for % 47.3
53.8 Expected goals for % 47.4
-1.5 xGF% relative to team -1.5
50.0 Goals for % 50.0
98.4 PDO 100.6
15 Shot attempts taken 18
Expected goals, all situations
1.5 Expected goals 1.7
0.57 Expected goals per 60 0.85
10.4% Chance per attempt 11.3%
-1.5 Goals above expected -0.7
Rating, in goals
+0.1 Goals above replacement -0.2
+0.0 Wins above replacement 0.0
0.0 Even-strength offence -0.2
-0.3 Even-strength defence -0.1
-0.2 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.2 Penalties -0.2
Contract
$743K Cap hit $1.45M
$371K Cap dollars per point $725K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean