Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Peter Cehlarik Gage Quinney

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerPeter Cehlarik: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentilePeter Cehlarik: Assists, 0.33 a game, 71st percentilePeter Cehlarik: Points, 0.33 a game, 35th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Shots, 0.00 a game, 1st percentilePeter Cehlarik: Hits, 0.67 a game, 32nd percentilePeter Cehlarik: Corsi for %, 63.6%, 99th percentilePeter Cehlarik: CF% rel, 13.9, 99th percentilePeter Cehlarik: On-ice xG %, 62.9%, 99th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 24th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Chances created, 0.16 xG per 60, 1st percentilePeter Cehlarik: Shot quality, 8.9% a shot, 75th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 55th percentileGage Quinney: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileGage Quinney: Assists, 0.33 a game, 71st percentileGage Quinney: Points, 0.33 a game, 35th percentileGage Quinney: Shots, 0.67 a game, 2nd percentileGage Quinney: Hits, 0.67 a game, 32nd percentileGage Quinney: Corsi for %, 54.5%, 90th percentileGage Quinney: CF% rel, 4.2, 86th percentileGage Quinney: On-ice xG %, 57.1%, 95th percentileGage Quinney: Rating, +0.6 goals above replacement, 27th percentileGage Quinney: Chances created, 0.92 xG per 60, 72nd percentileGage Quinney: Shot quality, 11.1% a shot, 99th percentileGage Quinney: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 49th percentile
00.20.40.60.81Peter Cehlarik 1Gage Quinney 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Peter Cehlarik
Gage Quinney

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Peter Cehlarik L, BOS 2019-20 Gage Quinney C, VGK
3 Games played 3
0 Goals 0
1 Assists 1
1 Points 1
0.33 Points per game 0.33
-1 Plus/minus -1
0 Shots 2
0.0 Shooting % 0.0
2 Hits 2
2 Penalty minutes 0
11:16 Average ice time 9:43
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
63.6 Corsi for % 54.5
+13.9 CF% relative to team +4.2
68.2 Fenwick for % 56.8
62.9 Expected goals for % 57.1
+12.7 xGF% relative to team +4.4
33.3 Goals for % 40.0
89.2 PDO 90.4
2 Shot attempts taken 4
Expected goals, all situations
0.1 Expected goals 0.4
0.16 Expected goals per 60 0.92
8.9% Chance per attempt 11.1%
-0.1 Goals above expected -0.4
Rating, in goals
+0.3 Goals above replacement +0.6
+0.1 Wins above replacement +0.1
+0.2 Even-strength offence +0.3
+0.3 Even-strength defence -0.1
0.0 Power play 0.0
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.2 Penalties +0.3
Contract
$700K Cap hit $715K
$700K Cap dollars per point $715K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean