Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Peter Cehlarik Lias Andersson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerPeter Cehlarik: Goals, 0.17 a game, 44th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Assists, 0.17 a game, 33rd percentilePeter Cehlarik: Points, 0.33 a game, 36th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Shots, 0.50 a game, 1st percentilePeter Cehlarik: Hits, 0.50 a game, 19th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Corsi for %, 46.1%, 11th percentilePeter Cehlarik: CF% rel, -7.9, 1st percentilePeter Cehlarik: On-ice xG %, 46.3%, 21st percentilePeter Cehlarik: Rating, -0.8 goals above replacement, 13th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Chances created, 0.34 xG per 60, 1st percentilePeter Cehlarik: Shot quality, 11.7% a shot, 99th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Finishing, +0.5 goals above expected, 57th percentileLias Andersson: Goals, 0.14 a game, 37th percentileLias Andersson: Assists, 0.14 a game, 25th percentileLias Andersson: Points, 0.29 a game, 30th percentileLias Andersson: Shots, 0.71 a game, 2nd percentileLias Andersson: Hits, 1.29 a game, 66th percentileLias Andersson: Corsi for %, 43.9%, 5th percentileLias Andersson: CF% rel, -1.8, 29th percentileLias Andersson: On-ice xG %, 32.2%, 1st percentileLias Andersson: Rating, -0.5 goals above replacement, 16th percentileLias Andersson: Chances created, 0.26 xG per 60, 1st percentileLias Andersson: Shot quality, 4.5% a shot, 1st percentileLias Andersson: Finishing, +0.6 goals above expected, 58th percentile
00.511.52Peter Cehlarik 2Lias Andersson 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Peter Cehlarik
Lias Andersson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Peter Cehlarik L, BOS 2017-18 Lias Andersson C, LAK
6 Games played 7
1 Goals 1
1 Assists 1
2 Points 2
0.33 Points per game 0.29
2 Plus/minus 1
3 Shots 5
33.3 Shooting % 20.0
3 Hits 9
2 Penalty minutes 0
13:56 Average ice time 11:57
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.1 Corsi for % 43.9
-7.9 CF% relative to team -1.8
50.4 Fenwick for % 38.5
46.3 Expected goals for % 32.2
-6.1 xGF% relative to team -14.8
66.7 Goals for % 57.1
103.8 PDO 107.1
6 Shot attempts taken 10
Expected goals, all situations
0.5 Expected goals 0.4
0.34 Expected goals per 60 0.26
11.7% Chance per attempt 4.5%
+0.5 Goals above expected +0.6
Rating, in goals
-0.8 Goals above replacement -0.5
-0.1 Wins above replacement -0.1
-0.3 Even-strength offence -0.3
-0.4 Even-strength defence -0.6
-0.2 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
-0.2 Penalties +0.2
Contract
$743K Cap hit $925K
$371K Cap dollars per point $463K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean