Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Juuse Saros Curtis McElhinney

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerJuuse Saros: Save %, 0.923, 82nd percentileJuuse Saros: Goals against, 2.24 a game, 73rd percentileJuuse Saros: Workload, 29.2 shots a game, 64th percentileJuuse Saros: Games, 21 games, 5th percentileJuuse Saros: Goals saved, +0.29 above expected per 60, 82nd percentileCurtis McElhinney: Save %, 0.917, 62nd percentileCurtis McElhinney: Goals against, 2.43 a game, 45th percentileCurtis McElhinney: Workload, 29.3 shots a game, 67th percentileCurtis McElhinney: Games, 21 games, 5th percentileCurtis McElhinney: Goals saved, +0.21 above expected per 60, 73rd percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Juuse Saros G, NSH 2016-17 Curtis McElhinney G, TBL
21 Games played 21
10 Wins 8
8 Losses 8
1 Shutouts 1
614 Shots against 616
567 Saves 565
47 Goals against 51
0.923 Save % 0.917
2.35 Goals against average 2.70
Expected goals, while he was in net
52.7 Expected goals against 55.0
+5.7 Goals saved above expected +4.0
+0.29 Saved above expected per 60 +0.21
5.9% Chance per attempt faced 6.4%
Rating, in goals
+11.1 Goals above replacement +9.6
+1.8 Wins above replacement +1.6
Contract
$693K Cap hit $800K
$3M Worth at the going rate $2.7M
+$2.3M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.9M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean