Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2025-26 season

At a glance

Miles Wood Nikita Grebenkin

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMiles Wood: Goals, 0.15 a game, 37th percentileMiles Wood: Assists, 0.11 a game, 16th percentileMiles Wood: Points, 0.26 a game, 26th percentileMiles Wood: Shots, 1.31 a game, 41st percentileMiles Wood: Hits, 1.17 a game, 57th percentileMiles Wood: Corsi for %, 45.4%, 11th percentileMiles Wood: CF% rel, -6.4, 4th percentileMiles Wood: On-ice xG %, 47.0%, 26th percentileMiles Wood: Rating, -0.5 goals above replacement, 18th percentileMiles Wood: Chances created, 0.74 xG per 60, 38th percentileMiles Wood: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 27th percentileMiles Wood: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 59th percentileNikita Grebenkin: Goals, 0.07 a game, 15th percentileNikita Grebenkin: Assists, 0.18 a game, 35th percentileNikita Grebenkin: Points, 0.25 a game, 25th percentileNikita Grebenkin: Shots, 0.58 a game, 2nd percentileNikita Grebenkin: Hits, 1.56 a game, 71st percentileNikita Grebenkin: Corsi for %, 47.3%, 23rd percentileNikita Grebenkin: CF% rel, 0.6, 54th percentileNikita Grebenkin: On-ice xG %, 49.2%, 44th percentileNikita Grebenkin: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 32nd percentileNikita Grebenkin: Chances created, 0.35 xG per 60, 1st percentileNikita Grebenkin: Shot quality, 8.3% a shot, 47th percentileNikita Grebenkin: Finishing, -0.6 goals above expected, 53rd percentile
05102040Miles Wood 14Nikita Grebenkin 14

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Miles Wood
Nikita Grebenkin

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Miles Wood L, TOR 2025-26 Nikita Grebenkin R, PHI
54 Games played 55
8 Goals 4
6 Assists 10
14 Points 14
0.26 Points per game 0.25
-10 Plus/minus -7
71 Shots 32
11.3 Shooting % 12.5
63 Hits 86
26 Penalty minutes 46
11:51 Average ice time 11:17
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.4 Corsi for % 47.3
-6.4 CF% relative to team +0.6
44.0 Fenwick for % 47.5
47.0 Expected goals for % 49.2
-4.8 xGF% relative to team -1.0
38.0 Goals for % 43.2
97.1 PDO 97.6
125 Shot attempts taken 68
Expected goals, all situations
7.9 Expected goals 3.6
0.74 Expected goals per 60 0.35
7.7% Chance per attempt 8.3%
+0.1 Goals above expected -0.6
Rating, in goals
-0.5 Goals above replacement +1.0
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.2
-1.5 Even-strength offence -2.1
-1.3 Even-strength defence +0.8
0.0 Power play -0.2
+0.3 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.3 Penalties +0.9
Contract
$2.5M Cap hit $875K
$179K Cap dollars per point $63K
$364K Worth at the going rate $1.7M
-$2.1M Value: worth minus cap hit +$789K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean