Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2025-26 season

At a glance

Nick Paul Tanner Pearson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNick Paul: Goals, 0.14 a game, 34th percentileNick Paul: Assists, 0.16 a game, 28th percentileNick Paul: Points, 0.29 a game, 32nd percentileNick Paul: Shots, 1.33 a game, 41st percentileNick Paul: Hits, 1.47 a game, 69th percentileNick Paul: Corsi for %, 51.5%, 69th percentileNick Paul: CF% rel, -3.0, 19th percentileNick Paul: On-ice xG %, 50.3%, 54th percentileNick Paul: Rating, -0.5 goals above replacement, 18th percentileNick Paul: Chances created, 0.79 xG per 60, 47th percentileNick Paul: Shot quality, 8.3% a shot, 49th percentileNick Paul: Finishing, -2.2 goals above expected, 36th percentileTanner Pearson: Goals, 0.13 a game, 30th percentileTanner Pearson: Assists, 0.14 a game, 23rd percentileTanner Pearson: Points, 0.27 a game, 27th percentileTanner Pearson: Shots, 0.93 a game, 16th percentileTanner Pearson: Hits, 1.32 a game, 63rd percentileTanner Pearson: Corsi for %, 46.2%, 16th percentileTanner Pearson: CF% rel, -3.1, 19th percentileTanner Pearson: On-ice xG %, 45.9%, 19th percentileTanner Pearson: Rating, +0.2 goals above replacement, 25th percentileTanner Pearson: Chances created, 0.51 xG per 60, 8th percentileTanner Pearson: Shot quality, 6.7% a shot, 6th percentileTanner Pearson: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 67th percentile
0510152040Nick Paul 15Tanner Pearson 15

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nick Paul
Tanner Pearson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nick Paul L, TOR 2025-26 Tanner Pearson L, BUF
51 Games played 56
7 Goals 7
8 Assists 8
15 Points 15
0.29 Points per game 0.27
-15 Plus/minus 9
68 Shots 52
10.3 Shooting % 13.5
75 Hits 74
32 Penalty minutes 27
13:41 Average ice time 10:50
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.5 Corsi for % 46.2
-3.0 CF% relative to team -3.1
49.6 Fenwick for % 46.8
50.3 Expected goals for % 45.9
-5.6 xGF% relative to team -1.7
37.5 Goals for % 60.5
95.3 PDO 104.4
116 Shot attempts taken 95
Expected goals, all situations
9.2 Expected goals 5.2
0.79 Expected goals per 60 0.51
8.3% Chance per attempt 6.7%
-2.2 Goals above expected +0.8
Rating, in goals
-0.5 Goals above replacement +0.2
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.0
-3.0 Even-strength offence -0.7
+0.9 Even-strength defence -0.1
-0.4 Power play -0.2
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.5
+0.2 Penalties -1.1
Contract
$3.15M Cap hit $1M
$210K Cap dollars per point $67K
$336K Worth at the going rate $925K
-$2.8M Value: worth minus cap hit -$75K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean