Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

Ben Harpur Jonathan Ericsson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBen Harpur: Goals, 0.02 a game, 15th percentileBen Harpur: Assists, 0.08 a game, 6th percentileBen Harpur: Points, 0.10 a game, 6th percentileBen Harpur: Shots, 0.98 a game, 17th percentileBen Harpur: Hits, 1.75 a game, 70th percentileBen Harpur: Corsi for %, 41.1%, 1st percentileBen Harpur: CF% rel, -5.2, 6th percentileBen Harpur: On-ice xG %, 42.0%, 2nd percentileBen Harpur: Rating, -1.9 goals above replacement, 13th percentileBen Harpur: Chances created, 0.09 xG per 60, 3rd percentileBen Harpur: Shot quality, 2.0% a shot, 2nd percentileBen Harpur: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 50th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Goals, 0.06 a game, 49th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Assists, 0.04 a game, 1st percentileJonathan Ericsson: Points, 0.10 a game, 5th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Shots, 0.92 a game, 13th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Hits, 1.88 a game, 77th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Corsi for %, 44.7%, 6th percentileJonathan Ericsson: CF% rel, -4.0, 12th percentileJonathan Ericsson: On-ice xG %, 37.6%, 1st percentileJonathan Ericsson: Rating, -8.0 goals above replacement, 1st percentileJonathan Ericsson: Chances created, 0.11 xG per 60, 7th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Shot quality, 2.4% a shot, 11th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Finishing, +1.4 goals above expected, 77th percentile
0123452040Ben Harpur 5Jonathan Ericsson 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Ben Harpur
Jonathan Ericsson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Ben Harpur D, NYR 2018-19 Jonathan Ericsson D, DET
51 Games played 52
1 Goals 3
4 Assists 2
5 Points 5
0.10 Points per game 0.10
-13 Plus/minus -10
50 Shots 48
2.0 Shooting % 6.3
89 Hits 98
56 Penalty minutes 35
17:37 Average ice time 17:13
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
41.1 Corsi for % 44.7
-5.2 CF% relative to team -4.0
41.7 Fenwick for % 42.2
42.0 Expected goals for % 37.6
-4.8 xGF% relative to team -9.9
39.3 Goals for % 38.2
99.3 PDO 99.2
90 Shot attempts taken 100
Expected goals, all situations
1.3 Expected goals 1.6
0.09 Expected goals per 60 0.11
2.0% Chance per attempt 2.4%
-0.3 Goals above expected +1.4
Rating, in goals
-1.9 Goals above replacement -8.0
-0.3 Wins above replacement -1.3
-3.8 Even-strength offence -3.4
-0.4 Even-strength defence -5.8
0.0 Power play 0.0
-0.2 Penalty kill -0.4
-0.4 Penalties -1.4
Contract
$725K Cap hit $4.25M
$145K Cap dollars per point $850K
-$704K Worth at the going rate -$4.9M
-$1.4M Value: worth minus cap hit -$9.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean