Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Marko Dano Markus Granlund

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMarko Dano: Goals, 0.15 a game, 45th percentileMarko Dano: Assists, 0.15 a game, 33rd percentileMarko Dano: Points, 0.29 a game, 38th percentileMarko Dano: Shots, 1.59 a game, 48th percentileMarko Dano: Hits, 1.82 a game, 79th percentileMarko Dano: Corsi for %, 53.7%, 84th percentileMarko Dano: CF% rel, 2.2, 69th percentileMarko Dano: On-ice xG %, 51.4%, 60th percentileMarko Dano: Rating, +1.4 goals above replacement, 36th percentileMarko Dano: Chances created, 0.74 xG per 60, 54th percentileMarko Dano: Shot quality, 6.8% a shot, 28th percentileMarko Dano: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 54th percentileMarkus Granlund: Goals, 0.13 a game, 38th percentileMarkus Granlund: Assists, 0.09 a game, 14th percentileMarkus Granlund: Points, 0.21 a game, 25th percentileMarkus Granlund: Shots, 1.19 a game, 26th percentileMarkus Granlund: Hits, 0.66 a game, 26th percentileMarkus Granlund: Corsi for %, 44.3%, 6th percentileMarkus Granlund: CF% rel, -4.2, 11th percentileMarkus Granlund: On-ice xG %, 42.7%, 5th percentileMarkus Granlund: Rating, -1.3 goals above replacement, 11th percentileMarkus Granlund: Chances created, 0.54 xG per 60, 19th percentileMarkus Granlund: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 34th percentileMarkus Granlund: Finishing, -0.8 goals above expected, 45th percentile
02468102040Marko Dano 10Markus Granlund 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Marko Dano
Markus Granlund

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Marko Dano C, CBJ 2015-16 Markus Granlund C, EDM
34 Games played 47
5 Goals 6
5 Assists 4
10 Points 10
0.29 Points per game 0.21
-7 Plus/minus -4
54 Shots 56
9.3 Shooting % 10.7
62 Hits 31
10 Penalty minutes 14
12:15 Average ice time 13:47
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.7 Corsi for % 44.3
+2.2 CF% relative to team -4.2
53.0 Fenwick for % 42.2
51.4 Expected goals for % 42.7
+0.4 xGF% relative to team -5.9
36.7 Goals for % 39.5
95.2 PDO 99.2
85 Shot attempts taken 94
Expected goals, all situations
5.1 Expected goals 5.8
0.74 Expected goals per 60 0.54
6.8% Chance per attempt 7.0%
-0.1 Goals above expected -0.8
Rating, in goals
+1.4 Goals above replacement -1.3
+0.2 Wins above replacement -0.2
-0.4 Even-strength offence -2.4
+0.5 Even-strength defence -0.7
-0.4 Power play -0.5
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.3
+0.5 Penalties +0.2
Contract
$925K Cap hit $768K
$93K Cap dollars per point $77K
$1.4M Worth at the going rate -$252K
+$493K Value: worth minus cap hit -$1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean