Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

William Carrier Matt Beleskey

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerWilliam Carrier: Goals, 0.12 a game, 33rd percentileWilliam Carrier: Assists, 0.07 a game, 12th percentileWilliam Carrier: Points, 0.20 a game, 17th percentileWilliam Carrier: Shots, 1.22 a game, 27th percentileWilliam Carrier: Hits, 2.73 a game, 97th percentileWilliam Carrier: Corsi for %, 51.4%, 65th percentileWilliam Carrier: CF% rel, 4.3, 88th percentileWilliam Carrier: On-ice xG %, 50.9%, 57th percentileWilliam Carrier: Rating, +1.5 goals above replacement, 35th percentileWilliam Carrier: Chances created, 0.69 xG per 60, 43rd percentileWilliam Carrier: Shot quality, 6.5% a shot, 15th percentileWilliam Carrier: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 61st percentileMatt Beleskey: Goals, 0.06 a game, 11th percentileMatt Beleskey: Assists, 0.10 a game, 20th percentileMatt Beleskey: Points, 0.16 a game, 12th percentileMatt Beleskey: Shots, 1.61 a game, 48th percentileMatt Beleskey: Hits, 2.00 a game, 86th percentileMatt Beleskey: Corsi for %, 53.6%, 83rd percentileMatt Beleskey: CF% rel, -1.2, 35th percentileMatt Beleskey: On-ice xG %, 53.4%, 75th percentileMatt Beleskey: Rating, -2.6 goals above replacement, 3rd percentileMatt Beleskey: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 18th percentileMatt Beleskey: Shot quality, 5.3% a shot, 1st percentileMatt Beleskey: Finishing, -3.0 goals above expected, 20th percentile
024682040William Carrier 8Matt Beleskey 8

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

William Carrier
Matt Beleskey

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

William Carrier L, CAR 2016-17 Matt Beleskey L, NYR
41 Games played 49
5 Goals 3
3 Assists 5
8 Points 8
0.20 Points per game 0.16
-1 Plus/minus -10
50 Shots 79
10.0 Shooting % 3.8
112 Hits 98
21 Penalty minutes 47
9:00 Average ice time 13:16
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.4 Corsi for % 53.6
+4.3 CF% relative to team -1.2
51.0 Fenwick for % 55.4
50.9 Expected goals for % 53.4
+3.9 xGF% relative to team -1.2
47.8 Goals for % 35.3
99.6 PDO 94.1
72 Shot attempts taken 132
Expected goals, all situations
4.2 Expected goals 6.0
0.69 Expected goals per 60 0.55
6.5% Chance per attempt 5.3%
+0.8 Goals above expected -3.0
Rating, in goals
+1.5 Goals above replacement -2.6
+0.2 Wins above replacement -0.4
+0.1 Even-strength offence -3.1
+0.0 Even-strength defence +0.6
0.0 Power play -0.7
0.0 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.4 Penalties -1.3
Contract
$689K Cap hit $3.8M
$86K Cap dollars per point $475K
$1.5M Worth at the going rate -$1.1M
+$813K Value: worth minus cap hit -$4.9M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean