Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

William Carrier Jordan Nolan

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerWilliam Carrier: Goals, 0.12 a game, 33rd percentileWilliam Carrier: Assists, 0.07 a game, 12th percentileWilliam Carrier: Points, 0.20 a game, 17th percentileWilliam Carrier: Shots, 1.22 a game, 27th percentileWilliam Carrier: Hits, 2.73 a game, 97th percentileWilliam Carrier: Corsi for %, 51.4%, 65th percentileWilliam Carrier: CF% rel, 4.3, 88th percentileWilliam Carrier: On-ice xG %, 50.9%, 57th percentileWilliam Carrier: Rating, +1.5 goals above replacement, 35th percentileWilliam Carrier: Chances created, 0.69 xG per 60, 43rd percentileWilliam Carrier: Shot quality, 6.5% a shot, 15th percentileWilliam Carrier: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 61st percentileJordan Nolan: Goals, 0.09 a game, 20th percentileJordan Nolan: Assists, 0.09 a game, 14th percentileJordan Nolan: Points, 0.17 a game, 15th percentileJordan Nolan: Shots, 0.85 a game, 7th percentileJordan Nolan: Hits, 1.35 a game, 67th percentileJordan Nolan: Corsi for %, 52.2%, 73rd percentileJordan Nolan: CF% rel, -3.1, 18th percentileJordan Nolan: On-ice xG %, 47.9%, 32nd percentileJordan Nolan: Rating, -3.0 goals above replacement, 3rd percentileJordan Nolan: Chances created, 0.47 xG per 60, 7th percentileJordan Nolan: Shot quality, 5.7% a shot, 4th percentileJordan Nolan: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 55th percentile
024682040William Carrier 8Jordan Nolan 8

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

William Carrier
Jordan Nolan

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

William Carrier L, CAR 2016-17 Jordan Nolan C, STL
41 Games played 46
5 Goals 4
3 Assists 4
8 Points 8
0.20 Points per game 0.17
-1 Plus/minus -3
50 Shots 39
10.0 Shooting % 10.3
112 Hits 62
21 Penalty minutes 44
9:00 Average ice time 10:51
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.4 Corsi for % 52.2
+4.3 CF% relative to team -3.1
51.0 Fenwick for % 50.8
50.9 Expected goals for % 47.9
+3.9 xGF% relative to team -7.4
47.8 Goals for % 43.5
99.6 PDO 98.4
72 Shot attempts taken 88
Expected goals, all situations
4.2 Expected goals 3.9
0.69 Expected goals per 60 0.47
6.5% Chance per attempt 5.7%
+0.8 Goals above expected +0.1
Rating, in goals
+1.5 Goals above replacement -3.0
+0.2 Wins above replacement -0.5
+0.1 Even-strength offence -3.0
+0.0 Even-strength defence -0.5
0.0 Power play -0.1
0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.4 Penalties -0.7
Contract
$689K Cap hit $950K
$86K Cap dollars per point $119K
$1.5M Worth at the going rate -$1.3M
+$813K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean