Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

William Carrier Alan Quine

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerWilliam Carrier: Goals, 0.03 a game, 2nd percentileWilliam Carrier: Assists, 0.05 a game, 4th percentileWilliam Carrier: Points, 0.08 a game, 1st percentileWilliam Carrier: Shots, 1.41 a game, 33rd percentileWilliam Carrier: Hits, 3.05 a game, 98th percentileWilliam Carrier: Corsi for %, 53.3%, 85th percentileWilliam Carrier: CF% rel, 2.2, 72nd percentileWilliam Carrier: On-ice xG %, 52.8%, 75th percentileWilliam Carrier: Rating, +2.3 goals above replacement, 47th percentileWilliam Carrier: Chances created, 0.88 xG per 60, 74th percentileWilliam Carrier: Shot quality, 6.3% a shot, 12th percentileWilliam Carrier: Finishing, -3.8 goals above expected, 17th percentileAlan Quine: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileAlan Quine: Assists, 0.14 a game, 25th percentileAlan Quine: Points, 0.14 a game, 6th percentileAlan Quine: Shots, 0.71 a game, 2nd percentileAlan Quine: Hits, 1.52 a game, 72nd percentileAlan Quine: Corsi for %, 39.1%, 1st percentileAlan Quine: CF% rel, -8.9, 1st percentileAlan Quine: On-ice xG %, 37.6%, 1st percentileAlan Quine: Rating, -1.9 goals above replacement, 6th percentileAlan Quine: Chances created, 0.31 xG per 60, 1st percentileAlan Quine: Shot quality, 6.3% a shot, 15th percentileAlan Quine: Finishing, -1.3 goals above expected, 40th percentile
012320William Carrier 3Alan Quine 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

William Carrier
Alan Quine

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

William Carrier L, CAR 2017-18 Alan Quine C, CGY
37 Games played 21
1 Goals 0
2 Assists 3
3 Points 3
0.08 Points per game 0.14
-3 Plus/minus -2
52 Shots 15
1.9 Shooting % 0.0
113 Hits 32
19 Penalty minutes 4
8:50 Average ice time 11:44
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.3 Corsi for % 39.1
+2.2 CF% relative to team -8.9
53.3 Fenwick for % 37.2
52.8 Expected goals for % 37.6
+2.5 xGF% relative to team -9.9
42.1 Goals for % 47.1
98.0 PDO 101.7
93 Shot attempts taken 29
Expected goals, all situations
4.8 Expected goals 1.3
0.88 Expected goals per 60 0.31
6.3% Chance per attempt 6.3%
-3.8 Goals above expected -1.3
Rating, in goals
+2.3 Goals above replacement -1.9
+0.4 Wins above replacement -0.3
0.0 Even-strength offence -1.7
-0.2 Even-strength defence -0.8
-0.1 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.1
+1.7 Penalties -0.1
Contract
$689K Cap hit $613K
$230K Cap dollars per point $204K
$2.1M Worth at the going rate -$605K
+$1.4M Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean