Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

William Carrier Seth Griffith

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerWilliam Carrier: Goals, 0.03 a game, 2nd percentileWilliam Carrier: Assists, 0.05 a game, 4th percentileWilliam Carrier: Points, 0.08 a game, 1st percentileWilliam Carrier: Shots, 1.41 a game, 33rd percentileWilliam Carrier: Hits, 3.05 a game, 98th percentileWilliam Carrier: Corsi for %, 53.3%, 85th percentileWilliam Carrier: CF% rel, 2.2, 72nd percentileWilliam Carrier: On-ice xG %, 52.8%, 75th percentileWilliam Carrier: Rating, +2.3 goals above replacement, 47th percentileWilliam Carrier: Chances created, 0.88 xG per 60, 74th percentileWilliam Carrier: Shot quality, 6.3% a shot, 12th percentileWilliam Carrier: Finishing, -3.8 goals above expected, 17th percentileSeth Griffith: Goals, 0.10 a game, 21st percentileSeth Griffith: Assists, 0.05 a game, 3rd percentileSeth Griffith: Points, 0.14 a game, 6th percentileSeth Griffith: Shots, 0.71 a game, 2nd percentileSeth Griffith: Hits, 0.48 a game, 17th percentileSeth Griffith: Corsi for %, 49.4%, 41st percentileSeth Griffith: CF% rel, 1.7, 67th percentileSeth Griffith: On-ice xG %, 46.2%, 19th percentileSeth Griffith: Rating, -0.4 goals above replacement, 17th percentileSeth Griffith: Chances created, 0.34 xG per 60, 1st percentileSeth Griffith: Shot quality, 6.6% a shot, 21st percentileSeth Griffith: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 59th percentile
012320William Carrier 3Seth Griffith 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

William Carrier
Seth Griffith

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

William Carrier L, CAR 2017-18 Seth Griffith C, EDM
37 Games played 21
1 Goals 2
2 Assists 1
3 Points 3
0.08 Points per game 0.14
-3 Plus/minus -6
52 Shots 15
1.9 Shooting % 13.3
113 Hits 10
19 Penalty minutes 6
8:50 Average ice time 10:34
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.3 Corsi for % 49.4
+2.2 CF% relative to team +1.7
53.3 Fenwick for % 47.0
52.8 Expected goals for % 46.2
+2.5 xGF% relative to team +5.2
42.1 Goals for % 22.2
98.0 PDO 95.2
93 Shot attempts taken 20
Expected goals, all situations
4.8 Expected goals 1.2
0.88 Expected goals per 60 0.34
6.3% Chance per attempt 6.6%
-3.8 Goals above expected +0.8
Rating, in goals
+2.3 Goals above replacement -0.4
+0.4 Wins above replacement -0.1
0.0 Even-strength offence -1.2
-0.2 Even-strength defence +0.3
-0.1 Power play +0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+1.7 Penalties -0.1
Contract
$689K Cap hit $650K
$230K Cap dollars per point $217K
$2.1M Worth at the going rate $372K
+$1.4M Value: worth minus cap hit -$278K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean