Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2026-27 season

At a glance

William Carrier Mark Jankowski

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerWilliam Carrier: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileWilliam Carrier: Assists, 0.71 a game, 91st percentileWilliam Carrier: Points, 0.71 a game, 75th percentileWilliam Carrier: Shots, 1.29 a game, 42nd percentileWilliam Carrier: Hits, 3.00 a game, 88th percentileWilliam Carrier: Corsi for %, 60.5%, 88th percentileWilliam Carrier: CF% rel, 2.8, 62nd percentileWilliam Carrier: On-ice xG %, 68.0%, 95th percentileWilliam Carrier: Rating, +6.7 goals above replacement, 76th percentileWilliam Carrier: Chances created, 1.26 xG per 60, 84th percentileWilliam Carrier: Shot quality, 10.7% a shot, 81st percentileWilliam Carrier: Finishing, -1.7 goals above expected, 2nd percentileMark Jankowski: Goals, 0.57 a game, 90th percentileMark Jankowski: Assists, 0.14 a game, 33rd percentileMark Jankowski: Points, 0.71 a game, 75th percentileMark Jankowski: Shots, 1.29 a game, 42nd percentileMark Jankowski: Hits, 1.00 a game, 43rd percentileMark Jankowski: Corsi for %, 46.0%, 31st percentileMark Jankowski: CF% rel, -15.6, 3rd percentileMark Jankowski: On-ice xG %, 53.5%, 59th percentileMark Jankowski: Rating, +6.7 goals above replacement, 76th percentileMark Jankowski: Chances created, 1.26 xG per 60, 85th percentileMark Jankowski: Shot quality, 12.5% a shot, 94th percentileMark Jankowski: Finishing, +2.0 goals above expected, 96th percentile
012345William Carrier 5Mark Jankowski 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

William Carrier
Mark Jankowski

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

William Carrier L, CAR 2026-27 Mark Jankowski L, CAR
7 Games played 7
0 Goals 4
5 Assists 1
5 Points 5
0.71 Points per game 0.71
0 Plus/minus 1
9 Shots 9
0.0 Shooting % 44.4
21 Hits 7
6 Penalty minutes 0
11:41 Average ice time 13:31
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
60.5 Corsi for % 46.0
+2.8 CF% relative to team -15.6
65.1 Fenwick for % 49.4
68.0 Expected goals for % 53.5
+8.4 xGF% relative to team -11.0
54.5 Goals for % 50.0
96.9 PDO 104.1
19 Shot attempts taken 17
Expected goals, all situations
1.7 Expected goals 2.0
1.26 Expected goals per 60 1.26
10.7% Chance per attempt 12.5%
-1.7 Goals above expected +2.0
Rating, in goals
+6.7 Goals above replacement +6.7
+1.1 Wins above replacement +1.1
+2.3 Even-strength offence +2.0
+2.3 Even-strength defence +2.3
0.0 Power play -0.2
+0.1 Penalty kill +1.0
+0.0 Penalties -0.5
Contract
$2.15M Cap hit $1.85M
$430K Cap dollars per point $370K
$7.2M Worth at the going rate $7.2M
+$5.1M Value: worth minus cap hit +$5.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. The season is still being played, so each rating is projected over the whole season: the games played so far, plus the games left at the rate of the last three seasons and this one. What the advanced numbers mean