Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

William Carrier Marko Dano

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerWilliam Carrier: Goals, 0.03 a game, 2nd percentileWilliam Carrier: Assists, 0.05 a game, 4th percentileWilliam Carrier: Points, 0.08 a game, 1st percentileWilliam Carrier: Shots, 1.41 a game, 33rd percentileWilliam Carrier: Hits, 3.05 a game, 98th percentileWilliam Carrier: Corsi for %, 53.3%, 85th percentileWilliam Carrier: CF% rel, 2.2, 72nd percentileWilliam Carrier: On-ice xG %, 52.8%, 75th percentileWilliam Carrier: Rating, +2.3 goals above replacement, 47th percentileWilliam Carrier: Chances created, 0.88 xG per 60, 74th percentileWilliam Carrier: Shot quality, 6.3% a shot, 12th percentileWilliam Carrier: Finishing, -3.8 goals above expected, 17th percentileMarko Dano: Goals, 0.09 a game, 17th percentileMarko Dano: Assists, 0.04 a game, 2nd percentileMarko Dano: Points, 0.13 a game, 5th percentileMarko Dano: Shots, 0.96 a game, 11th percentileMarko Dano: Hits, 1.13 a game, 59th percentileMarko Dano: Corsi for %, 49.7%, 44th percentileMarko Dano: CF% rel, 0.0, 49th percentileMarko Dano: On-ice xG %, 48.4%, 34th percentileMarko Dano: Rating, +0.0 goals above replacement, 23rd percentileMarko Dano: Chances created, 0.73 xG per 60, 47th percentileMarko Dano: Shot quality, 6.1% a shot, 9th percentileMarko Dano: Finishing, 0.0 goals above expected, 53rd percentile
012320William Carrier 3Marko Dano 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

William Carrier
Marko Dano

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

William Carrier L, CAR 2017-18 Marko Dano C, CBJ
37 Games played 23
1 Goals 2
2 Assists 1
3 Points 3
0.08 Points per game 0.13
-3 Plus/minus -2
52 Shots 22
1.9 Shooting % 9.1
113 Hits 26
19 Penalty minutes 6
8:50 Average ice time 7:11
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.3 Corsi for % 49.7
+2.2 CF% relative to team 0.0
53.3 Fenwick for % 51.6
52.8 Expected goals for % 48.4
+2.5 xGF% relative to team -0.8
42.1 Goals for % 41.7
98.0 PDO 97.6
93 Shot attempts taken 38
Expected goals, all situations
4.8 Expected goals 2.0
0.88 Expected goals per 60 0.73
6.3% Chance per attempt 6.1%
-3.8 Goals above expected 0.0
Rating, in goals
+2.3 Goals above replacement +0.0
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.0
0.0 Even-strength offence -0.6
-0.2 Even-strength defence +0.3
-0.1 Power play -0.1
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+1.7 Penalties -0.1
Contract
$689K Cap hit $850K
$230K Cap dollars per point $283K
$2.1M Worth at the going rate $643K
+$1.4M Value: worth minus cap hit -$207K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean