Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Seth Jones Nate Schmidt

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerSeth Jones: Goals, 0.11 a game, 79th percentileSeth Jones: Assists, 0.43 a game, 87th percentileSeth Jones: Points, 0.54 a game, 87th percentileSeth Jones: Shots, 2.25 a game, 88th percentileSeth Jones: Hits, 1.11 a game, 45th percentileSeth Jones: Corsi for %, 50.3%, 57th percentileSeth Jones: CF% rel, 2.3, 79th percentileSeth Jones: On-ice xG %, 50.7%, 57th percentileSeth Jones: Rating, +3.1 goals above replacement, 67th percentileSeth Jones: Chances created, 0.26 xG per 60, 71st percentileSeth Jones: Shot quality, 3.6% a shot, 75th percentileSeth Jones: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 51st percentileNate Schmidt: Goals, 0.12 a game, 84th percentileNate Schmidt: Assists, 0.41 a game, 86th percentileNate Schmidt: Points, 0.53 a game, 86th percentileNate Schmidt: Shots, 1.90 a game, 78th percentileNate Schmidt: Hits, 0.42 a game, 5th percentileNate Schmidt: Corsi for %, 53.5%, 89th percentileNate Schmidt: CF% rel, -3.0, 24th percentileNate Schmidt: On-ice xG %, 54.0%, 85th percentileNate Schmidt: Rating, +1.8 goals above replacement, 55th percentileNate Schmidt: Chances created, 0.24 xG per 60, 66th percentileNate Schmidt: Shot quality, 3.6% a shot, 78th percentileNate Schmidt: Finishing, +1.8 goals above expected, 83rd percentile
01020302040Nate Schmidt 31Seth Jones 30

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Seth Jones
Nate Schmidt

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Seth Jones D, FLA 2019-20 Nate Schmidt D, UTA
56 Games played 59
6 Goals 7
24 Assists 24
30 Points 31
0.54 Points per game 0.53
10 Plus/minus 11
126 Shots 112
4.8 Shooting % 6.3
62 Hits 25
20 Penalty minutes 12
25:17 Average ice time 21:41
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.3 Corsi for % 53.5
+2.3 CF% relative to team -3.0
51.1 Fenwick for % 53.5
50.7 Expected goals for % 54.0
-2.5 xGF% relative to team -5.2
55.8 Goals for % 52.9
100.7 PDO 100.2
183 Shot attempts taken 179
Expected goals, all situations
6.1 Expected goals 5.2
0.26 Expected goals per 60 0.24
3.6% Chance per attempt 3.6%
-0.1 Goals above expected +1.8
Rating, in goals
+3.1 Goals above replacement +1.8
+0.5 Wins above replacement +0.3
-0.1 Even-strength offence -0.5
-0.8 Even-strength defence -2.6
-0.4 Power play +0.6
+0.4 Penalty kill +0.6
-0.9 Penalties -0.5
Contract
$5.4M Cap hit $5.95M
$180K Cap dollars per point $192K
$3.2M Worth at the going rate $2.2M
-$2.2M Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.7M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean