Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Curtis Lazar Kevin Stenlund

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Curtis Lazar C, EDM		2019-20	Kevin Stenlund C, UTA
	38	Games played	32
	5	Goals	6
	5	Assists	4
	10	Points	10
	0.26	Points per game	0.31
	-3	Plus/minus	2
	33	Shots	57
	15.2	Shooting %	10.5
	70	Hits	19
	9	Penalty minutes	8
	11:50	Average ice time	13:59
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
	46.2	Corsi for %	48.4
	-3.6	CF% relative to team	+0.7
	47.4	Fenwick for %	50.1
	47.0	Expected goals for %	51.8
	-0.9	xGF% relative to team	+3.3
	37.9	Goals for %	56.5
	96.8	PDO	101.2
	53	Shot attempts taken	77
Expected goals, all situations
	4.8	Expected goals	5.0
	0.64	Expected goals per 60	0.66
	9.4%	Chance per attempt	7.1%
	-0.8	Goals above expected	+1.0
Rating, in goals
	+0.4	Goals above replacement	+1.6
	+0.1	Wins above replacement	+0.3
	-0.9	Even-strength offence	-1.3
	+1.0	Even-strength defence	+0.9
	0.0	Power play	+0.2
	-1.5	Penalty kill	-0.1
	+0.5	Penalties	+0.7
Contract
	$700K	Cap hit	$864K
	$70K	Cap dollars per point	$86K
	$1M	Worth at the going rate	$2M
	+$318K	Value: worth minus cap hit	+$1.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean