Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Anthony Mantha Garnet Hathaway

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAnthony Mantha: Goals, 0.20 a game, 62nd percentileAnthony Mantha: Assists, 0.10 a game, 19th percentileAnthony Mantha: Points, 0.30 a game, 40th percentileAnthony Mantha: Shots, 1.80 a game, 59th percentileAnthony Mantha: Hits, 0.40 a game, 10th percentileAnthony Mantha: Corsi for %, 54.7%, 90th percentileAnthony Mantha: CF% rel, 3.5, 83rd percentileAnthony Mantha: On-ice xG %, 49.5%, 46th percentileAnthony Mantha: Rating, +0.2 goals above replacement, 27th percentileAnthony Mantha: Chances created, 1.01 xG per 60, 90th percentileAnthony Mantha: Shot quality, 8.2% a shot, 70th percentileAnthony Mantha: Finishing, +0.0 goals above expected, 56th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileGarnet Hathaway: Assists, 0.21 a game, 48th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Points, 0.21 a game, 25th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shots, 0.79 a game, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Hits, 3.57 a game, 99th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Corsi for %, 49.8%, 48th percentileGarnet Hathaway: CF% rel, 0.0, 46th percentileGarnet Hathaway: On-ice xG %, 53.0%, 72nd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Rating, +2.0 goals above replacement, 43rd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Chances created, 0.44 xG per 60, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 58th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Finishing, -1.2 goals above expected, 40th percentile
0123Anthony Mantha 3Garnet Hathaway 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Anthony Mantha
Garnet Hathaway

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Anthony Mantha R, NJD 2015-16 Garnet Hathaway R, FLA
10 Games played 14
2 Goals 0
1 Assists 3
3 Points 3
0.30 Points per game 0.21
-6 Plus/minus -1
18 Shots 11
11.1 Shooting % 0.0
4 Hits 50
2 Penalty minutes 31
11:42 Average ice time 12:01
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
54.7 Corsi for % 49.8
+3.5 CF% relative to team 0.0
53.9 Fenwick for % 52.3
49.5 Expected goals for % 53.0
+1.7 xGF% relative to team +3.4
28.6 Goals for % 50.0
85.7 PDO 99.2
24 Shot attempts taken 19
Expected goals, all situations
2.0 Expected goals 1.2
1.01 Expected goals per 60 0.44
8.2% Chance per attempt 7.7%
+0.0 Goals above expected -1.2
Rating, in goals
+0.2 Goals above replacement +2.0
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.3
-0.1 Even-strength offence -0.5
-0.4 Even-strength defence +1.5
+0.4 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.0 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$863K Cap hit $690K
$288K Cap dollars per point $230K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean