Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Daniel Carr Joseph Blandisi

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDaniel Carr: Goals, 0.06 a game, 11th percentileDaniel Carr: Assists, 0.21 a game, 47th percentileDaniel Carr: Points, 0.27 a game, 30th percentileDaniel Carr: Shots, 1.33 a game, 32nd percentileDaniel Carr: Hits, 0.58 a game, 22nd percentileDaniel Carr: Corsi for %, 50.9%, 59th percentileDaniel Carr: CF% rel, -5.1, 8th percentileDaniel Carr: On-ice xG %, 56.0%, 92nd percentileDaniel Carr: Rating, +3.0 goals above replacement, 52nd percentileDaniel Carr: Chances created, 0.98 xG per 60, 87th percentileDaniel Carr: Shot quality, 8.7% a shot, 81st percentileDaniel Carr: Finishing, -3.5 goals above expected, 17th percentileJoseph Blandisi: Goals, 0.11 a game, 29th percentileJoseph Blandisi: Assists, 0.22 a game, 50th percentileJoseph Blandisi: Points, 0.33 a game, 41st percentileJoseph Blandisi: Shots, 0.89 a game, 11th percentileJoseph Blandisi: Hits, 1.37 a game, 69th percentileJoseph Blandisi: Corsi for %, 49.6%, 43rd percentileJoseph Blandisi: CF% rel, 0.3, 51st percentileJoseph Blandisi: On-ice xG %, 53.5%, 76th percentileJoseph Blandisi: Rating, -0.5 goals above replacement, 18th percentileJoseph Blandisi: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 17th percentileJoseph Blandisi: Shot quality, 8.4% a shot, 74th percentileJoseph Blandisi: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 50th percentile
0246820Daniel Carr 9Joseph Blandisi 9

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Daniel Carr
Joseph Blandisi

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Daniel Carr L, WSH 2016-17 Joseph Blandisi C, PIT
33 Games played 27
2 Goals 3
7 Assists 6
9 Points 9
0.27 Points per game 0.33
4 Plus/minus -10
44 Shots 24
4.5 Shooting % 12.5
19 Hits 37
6 Penalty minutes 26
10:15 Average ice time 13:22
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.9 Corsi for % 49.6
-5.1 CF% relative to team +0.3
53.6 Fenwick for % 48.6
56.0 Expected goals for % 53.5
+0.6 xGF% relative to team +4.4
59.1 Goals for % 35.3
102.0 PDO 97.1
73 Shot attempts taken 42
Expected goals, all situations
5.5 Expected goals 3.3
0.98 Expected goals per 60 0.55
8.7% Chance per attempt 8.4%
-3.5 Goals above expected -0.3
Rating, in goals
+3.0 Goals above replacement -0.5
+0.5 Wins above replacement -0.1
+0.6 Even-strength offence -1.0
+1.0 Even-strength defence +0.0
-0.1 Power play +0.5
+0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.5 Penalties -1.0
Contract
$725K Cap hit $648K
$81K Cap dollars per point $72K
$2.5M Worth at the going rate $259K
+$1.7M Value: worth minus cap hit -$389K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean