Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Dennis Everberg David Moss

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDennis Everberg: Goals, 0.05 a game, 10th percentileDennis Everberg: Assists, 0.16 a game, 34th percentileDennis Everberg: Points, 0.22 a game, 22nd percentileDennis Everberg: Shots, 1.13 a game, 20th percentileDennis Everberg: Hits, 1.33 a game, 55th percentileDennis Everberg: Corsi for %, 40.1%, 3rd percentileDennis Everberg: CF% rel, -3.4, 17th percentileDennis Everberg: On-ice xG %, 42.3%, 8th percentileDennis Everberg: Rating, +3.1 goals above replacement, 51st percentileDennis Everberg: Chances created, 0.54 xG per 60, 21st percentileDennis Everberg: Shot quality, 6.9% a shot, 34th percentileDennis Everberg: Finishing, -3.9 goals above expected, 13th percentileDavid Moss: Goals, 0.07 a game, 14th percentileDavid Moss: Assists, 0.13 a game, 26th percentileDavid Moss: Points, 0.20 a game, 18th percentileDavid Moss: Shots, 1.60 a game, 45th percentileDavid Moss: Hits, 1.92 a game, 77th percentileDavid Moss: Corsi for %, 49.3%, 38th percentileDavid Moss: CF% rel, 0.6, 52nd percentileDavid Moss: On-ice xG %, 52.1%, 61st percentileDavid Moss: Rating, +2.5 goals above replacement, 46th percentileDavid Moss: Chances created, 0.89 xG per 60, 81st percentileDavid Moss: Shot quality, 8.7% a shot, 86th percentileDavid Moss: Finishing, -7.5 goals above expected, 2nd percentile
0510204060Dennis Everberg 12David Moss 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Dennis Everberg
David Moss

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Dennis Everberg R, COL 2014-15 David Moss R, ARI
55 Games played 60
3 Goals 4
9 Assists 8
12 Points 12
0.22 Points per game 0.20
-7 Plus/minus -18
62 Shots 96
4.8 Shooting % 4.2
73 Hits 115
10 Penalty minutes 24
11:48 Average ice time 12:55
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
40.1 Corsi for % 49.3
-3.4 CF% relative to team +0.6
41.1 Fenwick for % 49.8
42.3 Expected goals for % 52.1
-0.9 xGF% relative to team +6.8
37.5 Goals for % 29.7
98.5 PDO 95.4
101 Shot attempts taken 144
Expected goals, all situations
5.9 Expected goals 11.5
0.54 Expected goals per 60 0.89
6.9% Chance per attempt 8.7%
-3.9 Goals above expected -7.5
Rating, in goals
+3.1 Goals above replacement +2.5
+0.5 Wins above replacement +0.4
-1.5 Even-strength offence -0.1
+1.4 Even-strength defence +0.9
-0.1 Power play +0.4
+0.2 Penalty kill +0.1
+1.4 Penalties -0.9
Contract
$612K Cap hit $800K
$51K Cap dollars per point $67K
$2.4M Worth at the going rate $2.1M
+$1.8M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean