Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Dennis Everberg Matt Fraser

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDennis Everberg: Goals, 0.05 a game, 10th percentileDennis Everberg: Assists, 0.16 a game, 34th percentileDennis Everberg: Points, 0.22 a game, 22nd percentileDennis Everberg: Shots, 1.13 a game, 20th percentileDennis Everberg: Hits, 1.33 a game, 55th percentileDennis Everberg: Corsi for %, 40.1%, 3rd percentileDennis Everberg: CF% rel, -3.4, 17th percentileDennis Everberg: On-ice xG %, 42.3%, 8th percentileDennis Everberg: Rating, +3.1 goals above replacement, 51st percentileDennis Everberg: Chances created, 0.54 xG per 60, 21st percentileDennis Everberg: Shot quality, 6.9% a shot, 34th percentileDennis Everberg: Finishing, -3.9 goals above expected, 13th percentileMatt Fraser: Goals, 0.13 a game, 38th percentileMatt Fraser: Assists, 0.07 a game, 6th percentileMatt Fraser: Points, 0.20 a game, 18th percentileMatt Fraser: Shots, 1.53 a game, 42nd percentileMatt Fraser: Hits, 1.85 a game, 75th percentileMatt Fraser: Corsi for %, 45.7%, 18th percentileMatt Fraser: CF% rel, -3.3, 18th percentileMatt Fraser: On-ice xG %, 39.5%, 3rd percentileMatt Fraser: Rating, -1.9 goals above replacement, 8th percentileMatt Fraser: Chances created, 0.54 xG per 60, 21st percentileMatt Fraser: Shot quality, 5.3% a shot, 1st percentileMatt Fraser: Finishing, +1.0 goals above expected, 64th percentile
0510204060Dennis Everberg 12Matt Fraser 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Dennis Everberg
Matt Fraser

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Dennis Everberg R, COL 2014-15 Matt Fraser R, EDM
55 Games played 60
3 Goals 8
9 Assists 4
12 Points 12
0.22 Points per game 0.20
-7 Plus/minus -16
62 Shots 92
4.8 Shooting % 8.7
73 Hits 111
10 Penalty minutes 17
11:48 Average ice time 11:13
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
40.1 Corsi for % 45.7
-3.4 CF% relative to team -3.3
41.1 Fenwick for % 45.5
42.3 Expected goals for % 39.5
-0.9 xGF% relative to team -7.1
37.5 Goals for % 34.0
98.5 PDO 96.5
101 Shot attempts taken 122
Expected goals, all situations
5.9 Expected goals 6.0
0.54 Expected goals per 60 0.54
6.9% Chance per attempt 5.3%
-3.9 Goals above expected +1.0
Rating, in goals
+3.1 Goals above replacement -1.9
+0.5 Wins above replacement -0.3
-1.5 Even-strength offence -3.7
+1.4 Even-strength defence -0.9
-0.1 Power play -0.1
+0.2 Penalty kill -0.1
+1.4 Penalties +1.1
Contract
$612K Cap hit $625K
$51K Cap dollars per point $52K
$2.4M Worth at the going rate -$564K
+$1.8M Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean