Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Garnet Hathaway Michael Mersch

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerGarnet Hathaway: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileGarnet Hathaway: Assists, 0.21 a game, 48th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Points, 0.21 a game, 25th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shots, 0.79 a game, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Hits, 3.57 a game, 99th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Corsi for %, 49.8%, 48th percentileGarnet Hathaway: CF% rel, 0.0, 46th percentileGarnet Hathaway: On-ice xG %, 53.0%, 72nd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Rating, +2.0 goals above replacement, 43rd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Chances created, 0.44 xG per 60, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 58th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Finishing, -1.2 goals above expected, 40th percentileMichael Mersch: Goals, 0.06 a game, 12th percentileMichael Mersch: Assists, 0.12 a game, 25th percentileMichael Mersch: Points, 0.18 a game, 17th percentileMichael Mersch: Shots, 1.35 a game, 36th percentileMichael Mersch: Hits, 1.53 a game, 69th percentileMichael Mersch: Corsi for %, 41.7%, 1st percentileMichael Mersch: CF% rel, -14.8, 1st percentileMichael Mersch: On-ice xG %, 36.3%, 1st percentileMichael Mersch: Rating, -0.8 goals above replacement, 16th percentileMichael Mersch: Chances created, 0.52 xG per 60, 17th percentileMichael Mersch: Shot quality, 4.8% a shot, 1st percentileMichael Mersch: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 50th percentile
0123Garnet Hathaway 3Michael Mersch 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Garnet Hathaway
Michael Mersch

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Garnet Hathaway R, FLA 2015-16 Michael Mersch L, LAK
14 Games played 17
0 Goals 1
3 Assists 2
3 Points 3
0.21 Points per game 0.18
-1 Plus/minus 1
11 Shots 23
0.0 Shooting % 4.3
50 Hits 26
31 Penalty minutes 0
12:01 Average ice time 10:23
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.8 Corsi for % 41.7
0.0 CF% relative to team -14.8
52.3 Fenwick for % 40.3
53.0 Expected goals for % 36.3
+3.4 xGF% relative to team -20.2
50.0 Goals for % 57.1
99.2 PDO 103.4
19 Shot attempts taken 32
Expected goals, all situations
1.2 Expected goals 1.5
0.44 Expected goals per 60 0.52
7.7% Chance per attempt 4.8%
-1.2 Goals above expected -0.5
Rating, in goals
+2.0 Goals above replacement -0.8
+0.3 Wins above replacement -0.1
-0.5 Even-strength offence -1.1
+1.5 Even-strength defence -0.3
0.0 Power play -0.1
+0.1 Penalty kill -0.1
+0.5 Penalties +0.4

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean