Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Garnet Hathaway Tim Schaller

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerGarnet Hathaway: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileGarnet Hathaway: Assists, 0.21 a game, 48th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Points, 0.21 a game, 25th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shots, 0.79 a game, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Hits, 3.57 a game, 99th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Corsi for %, 49.8%, 48th percentileGarnet Hathaway: CF% rel, 0.0, 46th percentileGarnet Hathaway: On-ice xG %, 53.0%, 72nd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Rating, +2.0 goals above replacement, 43rd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Chances created, 0.44 xG per 60, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 58th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Finishing, -1.2 goals above expected, 40th percentileTim Schaller: Goals, 0.06 a game, 12th percentileTim Schaller: Assists, 0.12 a game, 25th percentileTim Schaller: Points, 0.18 a game, 17th percentileTim Schaller: Shots, 1.06 a game, 20th percentileTim Schaller: Hits, 0.76 a game, 32nd percentileTim Schaller: Corsi for %, 46.4%, 18th percentileTim Schaller: CF% rel, 0.7, 54th percentileTim Schaller: On-ice xG %, 50.3%, 52nd percentileTim Schaller: Rating, +1.2 goals above replacement, 35th percentileTim Schaller: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 20th percentileTim Schaller: Shot quality, 5.9% a shot, 8th percentileTim Schaller: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 53rd percentile
0123Garnet Hathaway 3Tim Schaller 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Garnet Hathaway
Tim Schaller

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Garnet Hathaway R, FLA 2015-16 Tim Schaller L, LAK
14 Games played 17
0 Goals 1
3 Assists 2
3 Points 3
0.21 Points per game 0.18
-1 Plus/minus 3
11 Shots 18
0.0 Shooting % 5.6
50 Hits 13
31 Penalty minutes 2
12:01 Average ice time 8:19
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.8 Corsi for % 46.4
0.0 CF% relative to team +0.7
52.3 Fenwick for % 50.7
53.0 Expected goals for % 50.3
+3.4 xGF% relative to team +6.5
50.0 Goals for % 66.7
99.2 PDO 102.9
19 Shot attempts taken 23
Expected goals, all situations
1.2 Expected goals 1.3
0.44 Expected goals per 60 0.55
7.7% Chance per attempt 5.9%
-1.2 Goals above expected -0.3
Rating, in goals
+2.0 Goals above replacement +1.2
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.2
-0.5 Even-strength offence -0.1
+1.5 Even-strength defence +0.5
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.1 Penalty kill -0.1
+0.5 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$690K Cap hit $874K
$230K Cap dollars per point $291K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean