Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Garnet Hathaway John Hayden

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerGarnet Hathaway: Goals, 0.07 a game, 10th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Assists, 0.15 a game, 28th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Points, 0.22 a game, 17th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shots, 1.15 a game, 21st percentileGarnet Hathaway: Hits, 2.61 a game, 96th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Corsi for %, 53.4%, 85th percentileGarnet Hathaway: CF% rel, -0.8, 39th percentileGarnet Hathaway: On-ice xG %, 56.1%, 95th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Rating, +4.7 goals above replacement, 67th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Chances created, 0.74 xG per 60, 48th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shot quality, 8.5% a shot, 78th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Finishing, -4.4 goals above expected, 11th percentileJohn Hayden: Goals, 0.09 a game, 16th percentileJohn Hayden: Assists, 0.19 a game, 40th percentileJohn Hayden: Points, 0.28 a game, 28th percentileJohn Hayden: Shots, 1.19 a game, 23rd percentileJohn Hayden: Hits, 2.51 a game, 95th percentileJohn Hayden: Corsi for %, 47.8%, 25th percentileJohn Hayden: CF% rel, -6.0, 4th percentileJohn Hayden: On-ice xG %, 44.3%, 9th percentileJohn Hayden: Rating, +0.5 goals above replacement, 28th percentileJohn Hayden: Chances created, 0.59 xG per 60, 22nd percentileJohn Hayden: Shot quality, 6.6% a shot, 23rd percentileJohn Hayden: Finishing, -1.0 goals above expected, 43rd percentile
05102040Garnet Hathaway 13John Hayden 13

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Garnet Hathaway
John Hayden

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Garnet Hathaway R, FLA 2017-18 John Hayden C, SEA
59 Games played 47
4 Goals 4
9 Assists 9
13 Points 13
0.22 Points per game 0.28
3 Plus/minus -4
68 Shots 56
5.9 Shooting % 7.1
154 Hits 118
88 Penalty minutes 54
11:32 Average ice time 10:49
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.4 Corsi for % 47.8
-0.8 CF% relative to team -6.0
54.2 Fenwick for % 48.2
56.1 Expected goals for % 44.3
+3.7 xGF% relative to team -6.0
51.1 Goals for % 42.4
99.6 PDO 98.5
116 Shot attempts taken 92
Expected goals, all situations
8.4 Expected goals 5.0
0.74 Expected goals per 60 0.59
8.5% Chance per attempt 6.6%
-4.4 Goals above expected -1.0
Rating, in goals
+4.7 Goals above replacement +0.5
+0.8 Wins above replacement +0.1
+0.4 Even-strength offence -1.6
+1.8 Even-strength defence +1.1
-0.1 Power play -0.2
+0.9 Penalty kill -0.3
-0.2 Penalties +0.0
Contract
$650K Cap hit $925K
$50K Cap dollars per point $71K
$3.6M Worth at the going rate $947K
+$2.9M Value: worth minus cap hit +$22K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean