Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Garnet Hathaway J.T. Compher

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerGarnet Hathaway: Goals, 0.04 a game, 5th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Assists, 0.15 a game, 31st percentileGarnet Hathaway: Points, 0.19 a game, 17th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shots, 0.85 a game, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Hits, 2.15 a game, 89th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Corsi for %, 44.6%, 6th percentileGarnet Hathaway: CF% rel, -5.4, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: On-ice xG %, 42.9%, 5th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Rating, +0.7 goals above replacement, 30th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Chances created, 0.59 xG per 60, 23rd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shot quality, 7.5% a shot, 47th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Finishing, -1.3 goals above expected, 40th percentileJ.T. Compher: Goals, 0.14 a game, 40th percentileJ.T. Compher: Assists, 0.10 a game, 18th percentileJ.T. Compher: Points, 0.24 a game, 25th percentileJ.T. Compher: Shots, 1.43 a game, 39th percentileJ.T. Compher: Hits, 0.52 a game, 18th percentileJ.T. Compher: Corsi for %, 47.4%, 22nd percentileJ.T. Compher: CF% rel, -4.8, 9th percentileJ.T. Compher: On-ice xG %, 49.8%, 48th percentileJ.T. Compher: Rating, +1.7 goals above replacement, 38th percentileJ.T. Compher: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 18th percentileJ.T. Compher: Shot quality, 6.7% a shot, 21st percentileJ.T. Compher: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 55th percentile
01234520Garnet Hathaway 5J.T. Compher 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Garnet Hathaway
J.T. Compher

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Garnet Hathaway R, FLA 2016-17 J.T. Compher L, DET
26 Games played 21
1 Goals 3
4 Assists 2
5 Points 5
0.19 Points per game 0.24
0 Plus/minus 0
22 Shots 30
4.5 Shooting % 10.0
56 Hits 11
44 Penalty minutes 4
9:08 Average ice time 14:56
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.6 Corsi for % 47.4
-5.4 CF% relative to team -4.8
43.4 Fenwick for % 45.8
42.9 Expected goals for % 49.8
-7.4 xGF% relative to team +3.8
50.0 Goals for % 42.9
102.5 PDO 99.4
38 Shot attempts taken 48
Expected goals, all situations
2.3 Expected goals 2.9
0.59 Expected goals per 60 0.55
7.5% Chance per attempt 6.7%
-1.3 Goals above expected +0.1
Rating, in goals
+0.7 Goals above replacement +1.7
+0.1 Wins above replacement +0.3
-0.9 Even-strength offence -1.3
+0.4 Even-strength defence +2.0
0.0 Power play -0.4
+0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.5 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$690K Cap hit $925K
$138K Cap dollars per point $185K
$1.1M Worth at the going rate $1.7M
+$362K Value: worth minus cap hit +$745K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean