Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Garnet Hathaway Tanner Kero

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerGarnet Hathaway: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileGarnet Hathaway: Assists, 0.21 a game, 48th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Points, 0.21 a game, 25th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shots, 0.79 a game, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Hits, 3.57 a game, 99th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Corsi for %, 49.8%, 48th percentileGarnet Hathaway: CF% rel, 0.0, 46th percentileGarnet Hathaway: On-ice xG %, 53.0%, 72nd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Rating, +2.0 goals above replacement, 43rd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Chances created, 0.44 xG per 60, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 58th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Finishing, -1.2 goals above expected, 40th percentileTanner Kero: Goals, 0.06 a game, 12th percentileTanner Kero: Assists, 0.12 a game, 25th percentileTanner Kero: Points, 0.18 a game, 17th percentileTanner Kero: Shots, 1.53 a game, 45th percentileTanner Kero: Hits, 1.12 a game, 49th percentileTanner Kero: Corsi for %, 45.7%, 14th percentileTanner Kero: CF% rel, -8.2, 2nd percentileTanner Kero: On-ice xG %, 40.0%, 2nd percentileTanner Kero: Rating, -0.3 goals above replacement, 20th percentileTanner Kero: Chances created, 0.65 xG per 60, 41st percentileTanner Kero: Shot quality, 6.9% a shot, 29th percentileTanner Kero: Finishing, -1.3 goals above expected, 40th percentile
0123Garnet Hathaway 3Tanner Kero 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Garnet Hathaway
Tanner Kero

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Garnet Hathaway R, FLA 2015-16 Tanner Kero C, DAL
14 Games played 17
0 Goals 1
3 Assists 2
3 Points 3
0.21 Points per game 0.18
-1 Plus/minus -2
11 Shots 26
0.0 Shooting % 3.8
50 Hits 19
31 Penalty minutes 2
12:01 Average ice time 12:18
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.8 Corsi for % 45.7
0.0 CF% relative to team -8.2
52.3 Fenwick for % 43.5
53.0 Expected goals for % 40.0
+3.4 xGF% relative to team -10.7
50.0 Goals for % 38.5
99.2 PDO 98.7
19 Shot attempts taken 36
Expected goals, all situations
1.2 Expected goals 2.3
0.44 Expected goals per 60 0.65
7.7% Chance per attempt 6.9%
-1.2 Goals above expected -1.3
Rating, in goals
+2.0 Goals above replacement -0.3
+0.3 Wins above replacement -0.1
-0.5 Even-strength offence -0.6
+1.5 Even-strength defence -0.4
0.0 Power play -0.1
+0.1 Penalty kill -0.2
+0.5 Penalties +0.4

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean