Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Garnet Hathaway David Kampf

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerGarnet Hathaway: Goals, 0.14 a game, 37th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Assists, 0.11 a game, 14th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Points, 0.24 a game, 22nd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shots, 1.21 a game, 23rd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Hits, 2.86 a game, 95th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Corsi for %, 53.2%, 79th percentileGarnet Hathaway: CF% rel, 1.9, 64th percentileGarnet Hathaway: On-ice xG %, 56.9%, 94th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Rating, +10.1 goals above replacement, 91st percentileGarnet Hathaway: Chances created, 0.91 xG per 60, 71st percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shot quality, 10.1% a shot, 94th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Finishing, -2.8 goals above expected, 20th percentileDavid Kampf: Goals, 0.11 a game, 26th percentileDavid Kampf: Assists, 0.11 a game, 18th percentileDavid Kampf: Points, 0.23 a game, 19th percentileDavid Kampf: Shots, 1.29 a game, 27th percentileDavid Kampf: Hits, 0.74 a game, 37th percentileDavid Kampf: Corsi for %, 46.8%, 16th percentileDavid Kampf: CF% rel, -2.1, 22nd percentileDavid Kampf: On-ice xG %, 45.4%, 14th percentileDavid Kampf: Rating, +1.6 goals above replacement, 41st percentileDavid Kampf: Chances created, 0.63 xG per 60, 26th percentileDavid Kampf: Shot quality, 8.7% a shot, 71st percentileDavid Kampf: Finishing, -3.1 goals above expected, 18th percentile
051015204060Garnet Hathaway 16David Kampf 16

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Garnet Hathaway
David Kampf

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Garnet Hathaway R, FLA 2019-20 David Kampf C, WSH
66 Games played 70
9 Goals 8
7 Assists 8
16 Points 16
0.24 Points per game 0.23
6 Plus/minus -11
80 Shots 90
11.3 Shooting % 8.9
189 Hits 52
79 Penalty minutes 8
10:47 Average ice time 13:40
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.2 Corsi for % 46.8
+1.9 CF% relative to team -2.1
54.0 Fenwick for % 47.1
56.9 Expected goals for % 45.4
+6.5 xGF% relative to team -1.8
52.5 Goals for % 37.3
99.5 PDO 97.7
130 Shot attempts taken 125
Expected goals, all situations
10.8 Expected goals 10.1
0.91 Expected goals per 60 0.63
10.1% Chance per attempt 8.7%
-2.8 Goals above expected -3.1
Rating, in goals
+10.1 Goals above replacement +1.6
+1.7 Wins above replacement +0.3
+0.5 Even-strength offence -2.6
+4.1 Even-strength defence +0.4
0.0 Power play 0.0
+1.6 Penalty kill -0.1
+1.9 Penalties +1.2
Contract
$1.5M Cap hit $1M
$94K Cap dollars per point $63K
$9.1M Worth at the going rate $2M
+$7.6M Value: worth minus cap hit +$997K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean