Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Tomas Nosek Bryan Bickell

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTomas Nosek: Goals, 0.09 a game, 22nd percentileTomas Nosek: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileTomas Nosek: Points, 0.09 a game, 4th percentileTomas Nosek: Shots, 1.73 a game, 54th percentileTomas Nosek: Hits, 0.91 a game, 46th percentileTomas Nosek: Corsi for %, 46.3%, 15th percentileTomas Nosek: CF% rel, -1.8, 29th percentileTomas Nosek: On-ice xG %, 56.3%, 93rd percentileTomas Nosek: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 30th percentileTomas Nosek: Chances created, 1.27 xG per 60, 99th percentileTomas Nosek: Shot quality, 10.7% a shot, 99th percentileTomas Nosek: Finishing, -1.4 goals above expected, 40th percentileBryan Bickell: Goals, 0.09 a game, 22nd percentileBryan Bickell: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileBryan Bickell: Points, 0.09 a game, 4th percentileBryan Bickell: Shots, 0.73 a game, 3rd percentileBryan Bickell: Hits, 1.45 a game, 72nd percentileBryan Bickell: Corsi for %, 45.2%, 10th percentileBryan Bickell: CF% rel, -6.6, 5th percentileBryan Bickell: On-ice xG %, 37.9%, 1st percentileBryan Bickell: Rating, -1.4 goals above replacement, 10th percentileBryan Bickell: Chances created, 0.49 xG per 60, 10th percentileBryan Bickell: Shot quality, 6.7% a shot, 21st percentileBryan Bickell: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 54th percentile
00.20.40.60.81Tomas Nosek 1Bryan Bickell 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tomas Nosek
Bryan Bickell

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tomas Nosek L, FLA 2016-17 Bryan Bickell L, CAR
11 Games played 11
1 Goals 1
0 Assists 0
1 Points 1
0.09 Points per game 0.09
-1 Plus/minus -4
19 Shots 8
5.3 Shooting % 12.5
10 Hits 16
2 Penalty minutes 4
10:07 Average ice time 10:26
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.3 Corsi for % 45.2
-1.8 CF% relative to team -6.6
47.7 Fenwick for % 44.0
56.3 Expected goals for % 37.9
+7.2 xGF% relative to team -15.2
40.0 Goals for % 37.5
98.1 PDO 98.8
24 Shot attempts taken 18
Expected goals, all situations
2.4 Expected goals 0.9
1.27 Expected goals per 60 0.49
10.7% Chance per attempt 6.7%
-1.4 Goals above expected +0.1
Rating, in goals
+0.8 Goals above replacement -1.4
+0.1 Wins above replacement -0.2
+0.5 Even-strength offence -1.0
+0.0 Even-strength defence -0.5
0.0 Power play +0.1
-0.1 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.0 Penalties -0.3
Contract
$613K Cap hit $4M
$613K Cap dollars per point $4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean