Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Tomas Nosek Andrew Miller

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTomas Nosek: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileTomas Nosek: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileTomas Nosek: Points, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileTomas Nosek: Shots, 0.33 a game, 1st percentileTomas Nosek: Hits, 1.00 a game, 42nd percentileTomas Nosek: Corsi for %, 52.5%, 75th percentileTomas Nosek: CF% rel, 1.4, 59th percentileTomas Nosek: On-ice xG %, 56.2%, 92nd percentileTomas Nosek: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 26th percentileTomas Nosek: Chances created, 0.10 xG per 60, 1st percentileTomas Nosek: Shot quality, 3.5% a shot, 1st percentileTomas Nosek: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 54th percentileAndrew Miller: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileAndrew Miller: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileAndrew Miller: Points, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileAndrew Miller: Shots, 0.50 a game, 1st percentileAndrew Miller: Hits, 0.67 a game, 26th percentileAndrew Miller: Corsi for %, 48.0%, 30th percentileAndrew Miller: CF% rel, -0.9, 37th percentileAndrew Miller: On-ice xG %, 41.8%, 4th percentileAndrew Miller: Rating, -0.4 goals above replacement, 19th percentileAndrew Miller: Chances created, 0.60 xG per 60, 29th percentileAndrew Miller: Shot quality, 13.7% a shot, 99th percentileAndrew Miller: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 50th percentile
00.20.40.60.81Tomas Nosek 0Andrew Miller 0

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tomas Nosek
Andrew Miller

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tomas Nosek L, FLA 2015-16 Andrew Miller C, EDM
6 Games played 6
0 Goals 0
0 Assists 0
0 Points 0
0.00 Points per game 0.00
-2 Plus/minus -1
2 Shots 3
0.0 Shooting % 0.0
6 Hits 4
2 Penalty minutes 0
10:08 Average ice time 9:07
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
52.5 Corsi for % 48.0
+1.4 CF% relative to team -0.9
47.8 Fenwick for % 46.6
56.2 Expected goals for % 41.8
+13.1 xGF% relative to team -13.4
0.0 Goals for % 0.0
87.5 PDO 89.5
4 Shot attempts taken 4
Expected goals, all situations
0.1 Expected goals 0.5
0.10 Expected goals per 60 0.60
3.5% Chance per attempt 13.7%
-0.1 Goals above expected -0.5
Rating, in goals
+0.1 Goals above replacement -0.4
+0.0 Wins above replacement -0.1
-0.6 Even-strength offence -0.5
+0.6 Even-strength defence -0.2
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
-0.2 Penalties +0.2
Contract
$793K Cap hit $630K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean