Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Tomas Nosek Hudson Fasching

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTomas Nosek: Goals, 0.09 a game, 22nd percentileTomas Nosek: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileTomas Nosek: Points, 0.09 a game, 4th percentileTomas Nosek: Shots, 1.73 a game, 54th percentileTomas Nosek: Hits, 0.91 a game, 46th percentileTomas Nosek: Corsi for %, 46.3%, 15th percentileTomas Nosek: CF% rel, -1.8, 29th percentileTomas Nosek: On-ice xG %, 56.3%, 93rd percentileTomas Nosek: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 30th percentileTomas Nosek: Chances created, 1.27 xG per 60, 99th percentileTomas Nosek: Shot quality, 10.7% a shot, 99th percentileTomas Nosek: Finishing, -1.4 goals above expected, 40th percentileHudson Fasching: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileHudson Fasching: Assists, 0.10 a game, 18th percentileHudson Fasching: Points, 0.10 a game, 5th percentileHudson Fasching: Shots, 0.60 a game, 1st percentileHudson Fasching: Hits, 1.70 a game, 78th percentileHudson Fasching: Corsi for %, 50.0%, 47th percentileHudson Fasching: CF% rel, 4.4, 88th percentileHudson Fasching: On-ice xG %, 43.1%, 6th percentileHudson Fasching: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 23rd percentileHudson Fasching: Chances created, 0.43 xG per 60, 6th percentileHudson Fasching: Shot quality, 8.3% a shot, 71st percentileHudson Fasching: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 46th percentile
00.20.40.60.81Tomas Nosek 1Hudson Fasching 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tomas Nosek
Hudson Fasching

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tomas Nosek L, FLA 2016-17 Hudson Fasching R, NYI
11 Games played 10
1 Goals 0
0 Assists 1
1 Points 1
0.09 Points per game 0.10
-1 Plus/minus -1
19 Shots 6
5.3 Shooting % 0.0
10 Hits 17
2 Penalty minutes 2
10:07 Average ice time 10:25
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.3 Corsi for % 50.0
-1.8 CF% relative to team +4.4
47.7 Fenwick for % 47.3
56.3 Expected goals for % 43.1
+7.2 xGF% relative to team -0.1
40.0 Goals for % 33.3
98.1 PDO 98.7
24 Shot attempts taken 13
Expected goals, all situations
2.4 Expected goals 0.7
1.27 Expected goals per 60 0.43
10.7% Chance per attempt 8.3%
-1.4 Goals above expected -0.7
Rating, in goals
+0.8 Goals above replacement +0.1
+0.1 Wins above replacement +0.0
+0.5 Even-strength offence -0.3
+0.0 Even-strength defence -0.1
0.0 Power play 0.0
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.0 Penalties +0.2
Contract
$613K Cap hit $925K
$613K Cap dollars per point $925K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean