Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Sam Bennett Kevin Hayes

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerSam Bennett: Goals, 0.23 a game, 71st percentileSam Bennett: Assists, 0.23 a game, 52nd percentileSam Bennett: Points, 0.47 a game, 59th percentileSam Bennett: Shots, 1.77 a game, 58th percentileSam Bennett: Hits, 1.43 a game, 65th percentileSam Bennett: Corsi for %, 48.7%, 35th percentileSam Bennett: CF% rel, 0.8, 54th percentileSam Bennett: On-ice xG %, 49.4%, 45th percentileSam Bennett: Rating, +6.4 goals above replacement, 74th percentileSam Bennett: Chances created, 0.83 xG per 60, 73rd percentileSam Bennett: Shot quality, 9.1% a shot, 89th percentileSam Bennett: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 65th percentileKevin Hayes: Goals, 0.18 a game, 57th percentileKevin Hayes: Assists, 0.28 a game, 62nd percentileKevin Hayes: Points, 0.46 a game, 58th percentileKevin Hayes: Shots, 1.68 a game, 53rd percentileKevin Hayes: Hits, 0.75 a game, 31st percentileKevin Hayes: Corsi for %, 48.9%, 37th percentileKevin Hayes: CF% rel, 2.4, 72nd percentileKevin Hayes: On-ice xG %, 48.8%, 39th percentileKevin Hayes: Rating, +3.5 goals above replacement, 57th percentileKevin Hayes: Chances created, 0.66 xG per 60, 43rd percentileKevin Hayes: Shot quality, 6.3% a shot, 16th percentileKevin Hayes: Finishing, +2.1 goals above expected, 74th percentile
0102030204060Sam Bennett 36Kevin Hayes 36

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Sam Bennett
Kevin Hayes

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Sam Bennett C, FLA 2015-16 Kevin Hayes R, PIT
77 Games played 79
18 Goals 14
18 Assists 22
36 Points 36
0.47 Points per game 0.46
-11 Plus/minus 4
136 Shots 133
13.2 Shooting % 10.5
110 Hits 59
37 Penalty minutes 30
15:09 Average ice time 13:40
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.7 Corsi for % 48.9
+0.8 CF% relative to team +2.4
47.9 Fenwick for % 49.4
49.4 Expected goals for % 48.8
+0.3 xGF% relative to team +2.3
49.4 Goals for % 59.4
100.3 PDO 103.0
195 Shot attempts taken 205
Expected goals, all situations
16.2 Expected goals 11.9
0.83 Expected goals per 60 0.66
9.1% Chance per attempt 6.3%
+0.8 Goals above expected +2.1
Rating, in goals
+6.4 Goals above replacement +3.5
+1.1 Wins above replacement +0.6
+1.5 Even-strength offence +2.3
-0.1 Even-strength defence -1.6
-0.4 Power play +0.0
-0.2 Penalty kill -0.1
+2.3 Penalties -0.2
Contract
$925K Cap hit $900K
$26K Cap dollars per point $25K
$4.6M Worth at the going rate $2.8M
+$3.7M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.9M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean