Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

William Nylander Josh Jooris

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerWilliam Nylander: Goals, 0.27 a game, 82nd percentileWilliam Nylander: Assists, 0.32 a game, 72nd percentileWilliam Nylander: Points, 0.59 a game, 74th percentileWilliam Nylander: Shots, 1.95 a game, 66th percentileWilliam Nylander: Hits, 0.23 a game, 2nd percentileWilliam Nylander: Corsi for %, 53.9%, 85th percentileWilliam Nylander: CF% rel, 3.8, 86th percentileWilliam Nylander: On-ice xG %, 45.5%, 18th percentileWilliam Nylander: Rating, +1.4 goals above replacement, 38th percentileWilliam Nylander: Chances created, 0.71 xG per 60, 50th percentileWilliam Nylander: Shot quality, 6.0% a shot, 10th percentileWilliam Nylander: Finishing, +1.7 goals above expected, 72nd percentileJosh Jooris: Goals, 0.07 a game, 16th percentileJosh Jooris: Assists, 0.15 a game, 34th percentileJosh Jooris: Points, 0.22 a game, 25th percentileJosh Jooris: Shots, 1.36 a game, 36th percentileJosh Jooris: Hits, 1.05 a game, 46th percentileJosh Jooris: Corsi for %, 47.4%, 25th percentileJosh Jooris: CF% rel, -1.0, 35th percentileJosh Jooris: On-ice xG %, 53.7%, 76th percentileJosh Jooris: Rating, +1.2 goals above replacement, 34th percentileJosh Jooris: Chances created, 0.60 xG per 60, 29th percentileJosh Jooris: Shot quality, 7.3% a shot, 41st percentileJosh Jooris: Finishing, -3.3 goals above expected, 21st percentile
05102040William Nylander 13Josh Jooris 13

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

William Nylander
Josh Jooris

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

William Nylander R, TOR 2015-16 Josh Jooris R, PIT
22 Games played 59
6 Goals 4
7 Assists 9
13 Points 13
0.59 Points per game 0.22
1 Plus/minus -1
43 Shots 80
14.0 Shooting % 5.0
5 Hits 62
4 Penalty minutes 39
16:20 Average ice time 12:17
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.9 Corsi for % 47.4
+3.8 CF% relative to team -1.0
50.9 Fenwick for % 48.6
45.5 Expected goals for % 53.7
-2.1 xGF% relative to team +5.5
52.9 Goals for % 45.9
101.1 PDO 98.9
55 Shot attempts taken 123
Expected goals, all situations
4.3 Expected goals 7.3
0.71 Expected goals per 60 0.60
6.0% Chance per attempt 7.3%
+1.7 Goals above expected -3.3
Rating, in goals
+1.4 Goals above replacement +1.2
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.2
+0.5 Even-strength offence -1.1
-0.4 Even-strength defence +2.1
-0.5 Power play -0.1
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.6
+0.9 Penalties -1.1
Contract
$894K Cap hit $975K
$69K Cap dollars per point $75K
$1.5M Worth at the going rate $1.3M
+$562K Value: worth minus cap hit +$318K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean