Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Nick Schmaltz Travis Konecny

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNick Schmaltz: Goals, 0.10 a game, 25th percentileNick Schmaltz: Assists, 0.36 a game, 77th percentileNick Schmaltz: Points, 0.46 a game, 60th percentileNick Schmaltz: Shots, 1.08 a game, 18th percentileNick Schmaltz: Hits, 0.33 a game, 6th percentileNick Schmaltz: Corsi for %, 49.7%, 44th percentileNick Schmaltz: CF% rel, -1.0, 37th percentileNick Schmaltz: On-ice xG %, 46.3%, 18th percentileNick Schmaltz: Rating, +4.0 goals above replacement, 61st percentileNick Schmaltz: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 8th percentileNick Schmaltz: Shot quality, 7.5% a shot, 46th percentileNick Schmaltz: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 48th percentileTravis Konecny: Goals, 0.16 a game, 45th percentileTravis Konecny: Assists, 0.24 a game, 57th percentileTravis Konecny: Points, 0.40 a game, 51st percentileTravis Konecny: Shots, 1.90 a game, 63rd percentileTravis Konecny: Hits, 1.31 a game, 65th percentileTravis Konecny: Corsi for %, 50.5%, 53rd percentileTravis Konecny: CF% rel, -0.5, 42nd percentileTravis Konecny: On-ice xG %, 48.1%, 34th percentileTravis Konecny: Rating, +2.9 goals above replacement, 51st percentileTravis Konecny: Chances created, 0.81 xG per 60, 68th percentileTravis Konecny: Shot quality, 7.3% a shot, 39th percentileTravis Konecny: Finishing, -2.4 goals above expected, 27th percentile
01020204060Nick Schmaltz 28Travis Konecny 28

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nick Schmaltz
Travis Konecny

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nick Schmaltz C, UTA 2016-17 Travis Konecny R, PHI
61 Games played 70
6 Goals 11
22 Assists 17
28 Points 28
0.46 Points per game 0.40
10 Plus/minus -2
66 Shots 133
9.1 Shooting % 8.3
20 Hits 92
6 Penalty minutes 49
13:16 Average ice time 14:05
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.7 Corsi for % 50.5
-1.0 CF% relative to team -0.5
49.2 Fenwick for % 51.2
46.3 Expected goals for % 48.1
-4.8 xGF% relative to team -2.2
59.3 Goals for % 48.7
103.0 PDO 99.6
114 Shot attempts taken 204
Expected goals, all situations
6.4 Expected goals 13.4
0.48 Expected goals per 60 0.81
7.5% Chance per attempt 7.3%
-0.4 Goals above expected -2.4
Rating, in goals
+4.0 Goals above replacement +2.9
+0.7 Wins above replacement +0.5
+0.8 Even-strength offence +1.2
+1.4 Even-strength defence -2.7
-1.0 Power play -0.7
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.6 Penalties +2.4
Contract
$925K Cap hit $894K
$33K Cap dollars per point $32K
$3.1M Worth at the going rate $2.5M
+$2.2M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean