Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

John Quenneville Riley Barber

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJohn Quenneville: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileJohn Quenneville: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileJohn Quenneville: Points, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileJohn Quenneville: Shots, 1.56 a game, 45th percentileJohn Quenneville: Hits, 2.33 a game, 91st percentileJohn Quenneville: Corsi for %, 51.0%, 56th percentileJohn Quenneville: CF% rel, -0.4, 38th percentileJohn Quenneville: On-ice xG %, 43.4%, 7th percentileJohn Quenneville: Rating, -0.6 goals above replacement, 15th percentileJohn Quenneville: Chances created, 0.80 xG per 60, 55th percentileJohn Quenneville: Shot quality, 7.8% a shot, 43rd percentileJohn Quenneville: Finishing, -1.3 goals above expected, 37th percentileRiley Barber: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileRiley Barber: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileRiley Barber: Points, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileRiley Barber: Shots, 0.67 a game, 2nd percentileRiley Barber: Hits, 1.67 a game, 77th percentileRiley Barber: Corsi for %, 51.1%, 59th percentileRiley Barber: CF% rel, -3.5, 15th percentileRiley Barber: On-ice xG %, 54.8%, 83rd percentileRiley Barber: Rating, -0.6 goals above replacement, 15th percentileRiley Barber: Chances created, 0.53 xG per 60, 11th percentileRiley Barber: Shot quality, 9.4% a shot, 85th percentileRiley Barber: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 46th percentile
00.20.40.60.81John Quenneville 0Riley Barber 0

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

John Quenneville
Riley Barber

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

John Quenneville C, CHI 2019-20 Riley Barber R, DET
9 Games played 9
0 Goals 0
0 Assists 0
0 Points 0
0.00 Points per game 0.00
-1 Plus/minus -1
14 Shots 6
0.0 Shooting % 0.0
21 Hits 15
0 Penalty minutes 2
11:03 Average ice time 8:15
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.0 Corsi for % 51.1
-0.4 CF% relative to team -3.5
48.3 Fenwick for % 53.4
43.4 Expected goals for % 54.8
-2.8 xGF% relative to team +0.4
50.0 Goals for % 0.0
101.5 PDO 96.9
18 Shot attempts taken 11
Expected goals, all situations
1.3 Expected goals 0.7
0.80 Expected goals per 60 0.53
7.8% Chance per attempt 9.4%
-1.3 Goals above expected -0.7
Rating, in goals
-0.6 Goals above replacement -0.6
-0.1 Wins above replacement -0.1
-0.4 Even-strength offence -0.5
-0.5 Even-strength defence -0.2
-0.1 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.2 Penalties -0.2
Contract
$750K Cap hit $700K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean