Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Brandon Montour Philip Larsen

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBrandon Montour: Goals, 0.07 a game, 68th percentileBrandon Montour: Assists, 0.15 a game, 31st percentileBrandon Montour: Points, 0.22 a game, 43rd percentileBrandon Montour: Shots, 1.85 a game, 79th percentileBrandon Montour: Hits, 0.78 a game, 25th percentileBrandon Montour: Corsi for %, 48.4%, 33rd percentileBrandon Montour: CF% rel, -4.8, 7th percentileBrandon Montour: On-ice xG %, 51.7%, 67th percentileBrandon Montour: Rating, -0.3 goals above replacement, 28th percentileBrandon Montour: Chances created, 0.42 xG per 60, 98th percentileBrandon Montour: Shot quality, 4.4% a shot, 98th percentileBrandon Montour: Finishing, -1.3 goals above expected, 27th percentilePhilip Larsen: Goals, 0.04 a game, 32nd percentilePhilip Larsen: Assists, 0.19 a game, 49th percentilePhilip Larsen: Points, 0.23 a game, 45th percentilePhilip Larsen: Shots, 1.23 a game, 48th percentilePhilip Larsen: Hits, 0.46 a game, 8th percentilePhilip Larsen: Corsi for %, 47.6%, 24th percentilePhilip Larsen: CF% rel, -0.7, 42nd percentilePhilip Larsen: On-ice xG %, 40.8%, 1st percentilePhilip Larsen: Rating, -1.0 goals above replacement, 18th percentilePhilip Larsen: Chances created, 0.25 xG per 60, 76th percentilePhilip Larsen: Shot quality, 3.7% a shot, 80th percentilePhilip Larsen: Finishing, -0.8 goals above expected, 37th percentile
024620Brandon Montour 6Philip Larsen 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Brandon Montour
Philip Larsen

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Brandon Montour D, SEA 2016-17 Philip Larsen D, VAN
27 Games played 26
2 Goals 1
4 Assists 5
6 Points 6
0.22 Points per game 0.23
11 Plus/minus -8
50 Shots 32
4.0 Shooting % 3.1
21 Hits 12
14 Penalty minutes 4
17:23 Average ice time 16:28
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.4 Corsi for % 47.6
-4.8 CF% relative to team -0.7
47.3 Fenwick for % 46.6
51.7 Expected goals for % 40.8
-5.1 xGF% relative to team -3.3
80.0 Goals for % 41.7
106.5 PDO 99.0
72 Shot attempts taken 48
Expected goals, all situations
3.3 Expected goals 1.8
0.42 Expected goals per 60 0.25
4.4% Chance per attempt 3.7%
-1.3 Goals above expected -0.8
Rating, in goals
-0.3 Goals above replacement -1.0
-0.1 Wins above replacement -0.2
-0.5 Even-strength offence -0.3
-1.4 Even-strength defence -1.4
-0.2 Power play -0.5
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.2 Penalties -0.3
Contract
$925K Cap hit $1.025M
$154K Cap dollars per point $171K
$380K Worth at the going rate -$57K
-$545K Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean