Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

Michael Bunting Daniel Carr

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMichael Bunting: Goals, 0.20 a game, 58th percentileMichael Bunting: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileMichael Bunting: Points, 0.20 a game, 14th percentileMichael Bunting: Shots, 1.00 a game, 12th percentileMichael Bunting: Hits, 1.20 a game, 61st percentileMichael Bunting: Corsi for %, 53.7%, 83rd percentileMichael Bunting: CF% rel, 4.5, 91st percentileMichael Bunting: On-ice xG %, 47.5%, 30th percentileMichael Bunting: Rating, 0.0 goals above replacement, 20th percentileMichael Bunting: Chances created, 0.87 xG per 60, 63rd percentileMichael Bunting: Shot quality, 8.6% a shot, 73rd percentileMichael Bunting: Finishing, +0.3 goals above expected, 59th percentileDaniel Carr: Goals, 0.17 a game, 47th percentileDaniel Carr: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileDaniel Carr: Points, 0.17 a game, 7th percentileDaniel Carr: Shots, 1.83 a game, 58th percentileDaniel Carr: Hits, 1.50 a game, 70th percentileDaniel Carr: Corsi for %, 61.6%, 99th percentileDaniel Carr: CF% rel, 10.8, 99th percentileDaniel Carr: On-ice xG %, 55.4%, 87th percentileDaniel Carr: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 30th percentileDaniel Carr: Chances created, 1.07 xG per 60, 90th percentileDaniel Carr: Shot quality, 7.5% a shot, 36th percentileDaniel Carr: Finishing, 0.0 goals above expected, 54th percentile
00.20.40.60.81Michael Bunting 1Daniel Carr 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Michael Bunting
Daniel Carr

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Michael Bunting L, PHI 2018-19 Daniel Carr L, WSH
5 Games played 6
1 Goals 1
0 Assists 0
1 Points 1
0.20 Points per game 0.17
0 Plus/minus -1
5 Shots 11
20.0 Shooting % 9.1
6 Hits 9
2 Penalty minutes 0
9:33 Average ice time 9:50
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.7 Corsi for % 61.6
+4.5 CF% relative to team +10.8
49.2 Fenwick for % 58.8
47.5 Expected goals for % 55.4
+3.0 xGF% relative to team +1.4
50.0 Goals for % 40.0
100.2 PDO 91.7
11 Shot attempts taken 18
Expected goals, all situations
0.7 Expected goals 1.0
0.87 Expected goals per 60 1.07
8.6% Chance per attempt 7.5%
+0.3 Goals above expected 0.0
Rating, in goals
0.0 Goals above replacement +0.8
0.0 Wins above replacement +0.1
+0.1 Even-strength offence -0.3
-0.2 Even-strength defence +0.5
0.0 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.0 Penalties +0.3
Contract
$715K Cap hit $750K
$715K Cap dollars per point $750K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean