Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Gustav Forsling John-Michael Liles

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerGustav Forsling: Goals, 0.05 a game, 50th percentileGustav Forsling: Assists, 0.08 a game, 6th percentileGustav Forsling: Points, 0.13 a game, 12th percentileGustav Forsling: Shots, 1.26 a game, 51st percentileGustav Forsling: Hits, 0.42 a game, 7th percentileGustav Forsling: Corsi for %, 48.8%, 39th percentileGustav Forsling: CF% rel, -2.4, 22nd percentileGustav Forsling: On-ice xG %, 42.8%, 5th percentileGustav Forsling: Rating, -3.1 goals above replacement, 4th percentileGustav Forsling: Chances created, 0.20 xG per 60, 53rd percentileGustav Forsling: Shot quality, 2.8% a shot, 33rd percentileGustav Forsling: Finishing, +0.2 goals above expected, 59th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Assists, 0.14 a game, 28th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Points, 0.14 a game, 15th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Shots, 1.00 a game, 25th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Hits, 0.69 a game, 19th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Corsi for %, 53.3%, 86th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: CF% rel, 0.2, 54th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: On-ice xG %, 54.3%, 87th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Rating, +2.6 goals above replacement, 59th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 47th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Shot quality, 3.1% a shot, 51st percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Finishing, -1.7 goals above expected, 21st percentile
01234520Gustav Forsling 5John-Michael Liles 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Gustav Forsling
John-Michael Liles

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Gustav Forsling D, FLA 2016-17 John-Michael Liles D, BOS
38 Games played 36
2 Goals 0
3 Assists 5
5 Points 5
0.13 Points per game 0.14
3 Plus/minus 1
48 Shots 36
4.2 Shooting % 0.0
16 Hits 25
4 Penalty minutes 4
14:49 Average ice time 16:12
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.8 Corsi for % 53.3
-2.4 CF% relative to team +0.2
46.7 Fenwick for % 55.5
42.8 Expected goals for % 54.3
-8.4 xGF% relative to team -0.9
56.7 Goals for % 52.2
102.3 PDO 99.5
106 Shot attempts taken 64
Expected goals, all situations
1.8 Expected goals 1.7
0.20 Expected goals per 60 0.18
2.8% Chance per attempt 3.1%
+0.2 Goals above expected -1.7
Rating, in goals
-3.1 Goals above replacement +2.6
-0.5 Wins above replacement +0.4
-1.0 Even-strength offence -1.8
-3.5 Even-strength defence +1.4
-0.5 Power play 0.0
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.2
+0.2 Penalties +0.9
Contract
$873K Cap hit $2M
$175K Cap dollars per point $400K
-$1.4M Worth at the going rate $2.2M
-$2.3M Value: worth minus cap hit +$239K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean