Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Gustav Forsling Taylor Chorney

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerGustav Forsling: Goals, 0.05 a game, 50th percentileGustav Forsling: Assists, 0.08 a game, 6th percentileGustav Forsling: Points, 0.13 a game, 12th percentileGustav Forsling: Shots, 1.26 a game, 51st percentileGustav Forsling: Hits, 0.42 a game, 7th percentileGustav Forsling: Corsi for %, 48.8%, 39th percentileGustav Forsling: CF% rel, -2.4, 22nd percentileGustav Forsling: On-ice xG %, 42.8%, 5th percentileGustav Forsling: Rating, -3.1 goals above replacement, 4th percentileGustav Forsling: Chances created, 0.20 xG per 60, 53rd percentileGustav Forsling: Shot quality, 2.8% a shot, 33rd percentileGustav Forsling: Finishing, +0.2 goals above expected, 59th percentileTaylor Chorney: Goals, 0.06 a game, 52nd percentileTaylor Chorney: Assists, 0.22 a game, 57th percentileTaylor Chorney: Points, 0.28 a game, 57th percentileTaylor Chorney: Shots, 1.06 a game, 31st percentileTaylor Chorney: Hits, 1.50 a game, 63rd percentileTaylor Chorney: Corsi for %, 45.4%, 6th percentileTaylor Chorney: CF% rel, -4.7, 8th percentileTaylor Chorney: On-ice xG %, 46.4%, 18th percentileTaylor Chorney: Rating, +0.4 goals above replacement, 35th percentileTaylor Chorney: Chances created, 0.20 xG per 60, 54th percentileTaylor Chorney: Shot quality, 3.1% a shot, 50th percentileTaylor Chorney: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 59th percentile
01234520Gustav Forsling 5Taylor Chorney 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Gustav Forsling
Taylor Chorney

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Gustav Forsling D, FLA 2016-17 Taylor Chorney D, CBJ
38 Games played 18
2 Goals 1
3 Assists 4
5 Points 5
0.13 Points per game 0.28
3 Plus/minus 8
48 Shots 19
4.2 Shooting % 5.3
16 Hits 27
4 Penalty minutes 11
14:49 Average ice time 14:16
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.8 Corsi for % 45.4
-2.4 CF% relative to team -4.7
46.7 Fenwick for % 46.6
42.8 Expected goals for % 46.4
-8.4 xGF% relative to team -3.4
56.7 Goals for % 70.6
102.3 PDO 107.3
106 Shot attempts taken 34
Expected goals, all situations
1.8 Expected goals 0.9
0.20 Expected goals per 60 0.20
2.8% Chance per attempt 3.1%
+0.2 Goals above expected +0.1
Rating, in goals
-3.1 Goals above replacement +0.4
-0.5 Wins above replacement +0.1
-1.0 Even-strength offence +0.1
-3.5 Even-strength defence -0.1
-0.5 Power play 0.0
-0.1 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.2 Penalties -0.5
Contract
$873K Cap hit $800K
$175K Cap dollars per point $160K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean