Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Anton Lindholm Casey Nelson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAnton Lindholm: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileAnton Lindholm: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileAnton Lindholm: Points, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileAnton Lindholm: Shots, 0.58 a game, 3rd percentileAnton Lindholm: Hits, 3.17 a game, 97th percentileAnton Lindholm: Corsi for %, 49.3%, 44th percentileAnton Lindholm: CF% rel, -2.2, 24th percentileAnton Lindholm: On-ice xG %, 49.8%, 47th percentileAnton Lindholm: Rating, +0.2 goals above replacement, 34th percentileAnton Lindholm: Chances created, 0.11 xG per 60, 9th percentileAnton Lindholm: Shot quality, 2.2% a shot, 9th percentileAnton Lindholm: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 48th percentileCasey Nelson: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileCasey Nelson: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileCasey Nelson: Points, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileCasey Nelson: Shots, 0.91 a game, 19th percentileCasey Nelson: Hits, 1.36 a game, 58th percentileCasey Nelson: Corsi for %, 52.7%, 82nd percentileCasey Nelson: CF% rel, 1.0, 66th percentileCasey Nelson: On-ice xG %, 43.2%, 9th percentileCasey Nelson: Rating, -1.3 goals above replacement, 14th percentileCasey Nelson: Chances created, 0.10 xG per 60, 6th percentileCasey Nelson: Shot quality, 1.9% a shot, 1st percentileCasey Nelson: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 50th percentile
00.20.40.60.81Anton Lindholm 0Casey Nelson 0

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Anton Lindholm
Casey Nelson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Anton Lindholm D, COL 2016-17 Casey Nelson D, BUF
12 Games played 11
0 Goals 0
0 Assists 0
0 Points 0
0.00 Points per game 0.00
-8 Plus/minus -3
7 Shots 10
0.0 Shooting % 0.0
38 Hits 15
2 Penalty minutes 4
14:45 Average ice time 12:36
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.3 Corsi for % 52.7
-2.2 CF% relative to team +1.0
48.2 Fenwick for % 50.3
49.8 Expected goals for % 43.2
+1.4 xGF% relative to team -9.6
20.0 Goals for % 37.5
89.3 PDO 96.9
22 Shot attempts taken 18
Expected goals, all situations
0.3 Expected goals 0.2
0.11 Expected goals per 60 0.10
2.2% Chance per attempt 1.9%
-0.3 Goals above expected -0.2
Rating, in goals
+0.2 Goals above replacement -1.3
+0.0 Wins above replacement -0.2
-0.6 Even-strength offence -0.8
+0.3 Even-strength defence -0.6
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.1 Penalties -0.3
Contract
$718K Cap hit $650K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean