Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Anders Bjork William Carrier

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAnders Bjork: Goals, 0.16 a game, 44th percentileAnders Bjork: Assists, 0.17 a game, 31st percentileAnders Bjork: Points, 0.33 a game, 35th percentileAnders Bjork: Shots, 1.14 a game, 20th percentileAnders Bjork: Hits, 0.74 a game, 36th percentileAnders Bjork: Corsi for %, 50.0%, 44th percentileAnders Bjork: CF% rel, -1.3, 31st percentileAnders Bjork: On-ice xG %, 52.7%, 68th percentileAnders Bjork: Rating, +2.5 goals above replacement, 50th percentileAnders Bjork: Chances created, 0.57 xG per 60, 17th percentileAnders Bjork: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 16th percentileAnders Bjork: Finishing, +1.8 goals above expected, 72nd percentileWilliam Carrier: Goals, 0.10 a game, 20th percentileWilliam Carrier: Assists, 0.17 a game, 30th percentileWilliam Carrier: Points, 0.27 a game, 24th percentileWilliam Carrier: Shots, 1.39 a game, 35th percentileWilliam Carrier: Hits, 3.00 a game, 97th percentileWilliam Carrier: Corsi for %, 53.7%, 85th percentileWilliam Carrier: CF% rel, -1.3, 30th percentileWilliam Carrier: On-ice xG %, 56.4%, 92nd percentileWilliam Carrier: Rating, +2.9 goals above replacement, 56th percentileWilliam Carrier: Chances created, 0.84 xG per 60, 61st percentileWilliam Carrier: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 30th percentileWilliam Carrier: Finishing, -2.8 goals above expected, 21st percentile
051015204060Anders Bjork 19William Carrier 19

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Anders Bjork
William Carrier

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Anders Bjork L, CHI 2019-20 William Carrier L, CAR
58 Games played 71
9 Goals 7
10 Assists 12
19 Points 19
0.33 Points per game 0.27
5 Plus/minus 0
66 Shots 99
13.6 Shooting % 7.1
43 Hits 213
10 Penalty minutes 39
12:56 Average ice time 9:52
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.0 Corsi for % 53.7
-1.3 CF% relative to team -1.3
50.7 Fenwick for % 54.3
52.7 Expected goals for % 56.4
+0.4 xGF% relative to team -0.2
57.8 Goals for % 50.8
101.8 PDO 99.2
115 Shot attempts taken 157
Expected goals, all situations
7.2 Expected goals 9.8
0.57 Expected goals per 60 0.84
7.0% Chance per attempt 7.4%
+1.8 Goals above expected -2.8
Rating, in goals
+2.5 Goals above replacement +2.9
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.5
-2.1 Even-strength offence +1.4
+2.2 Even-strength defence +0.3
0.0 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.4 Penalties -0.9
Contract
$925K Cap hit $725K
$49K Cap dollars per point $38K
$2.8M Worth at the going rate $3.1M
+$1.9M Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean