Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Matthew Highmore Filip Chlapik

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMatthew Highmore: Goals, 0.06 a game, 7th percentileMatthew Highmore: Assists, 0.11 a game, 16th percentileMatthew Highmore: Points, 0.17 a game, 8th percentileMatthew Highmore: Shots, 0.97 a game, 12th percentileMatthew Highmore: Hits, 1.06 a game, 54th percentileMatthew Highmore: Corsi for %, 47.6%, 21st percentileMatthew Highmore: CF% rel, -1.9, 24th percentileMatthew Highmore: On-ice xG %, 42.6%, 6th percentileMatthew Highmore: Rating, +0.6 goals above replacement, 26th percentileMatthew Highmore: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 13th percentileMatthew Highmore: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 27th percentileMatthew Highmore: Finishing, -1.3 goals above expected, 40th percentileFilip Chlapik: Goals, 0.10 a game, 19th percentileFilip Chlapik: Assists, 0.10 a game, 11th percentileFilip Chlapik: Points, 0.19 a game, 12th percentileFilip Chlapik: Shots, 0.87 a game, 7th percentileFilip Chlapik: Hits, 2.29 a game, 90th percentileFilip Chlapik: Corsi for %, 51.1%, 59th percentileFilip Chlapik: CF% rel, 4.2, 86th percentileFilip Chlapik: On-ice xG %, 51.4%, 60th percentileFilip Chlapik: Rating, +0.2 goals above replacement, 21st percentileFilip Chlapik: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 6th percentileFilip Chlapik: Shot quality, 5.2% a shot, 1st percentileFilip Chlapik: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 65th percentile
024620Matthew Highmore 6Filip Chlapik 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Matthew Highmore
Filip Chlapik

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Matthew Highmore C, OTT 2019-20 Filip Chlapik C, OTT
36 Games played 31
2 Goals 3
4 Assists 3
6 Points 6
0.17 Points per game 0.19
-1 Plus/minus -7
35 Shots 27
5.7 Shooting % 11.1
38 Hits 71
6 Penalty minutes 10
9:49 Average ice time 8:46
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.6 Corsi for % 51.1
-1.9 CF% relative to team +4.2
45.3 Fenwick for % 54.1
42.6 Expected goals for % 51.4
-5.2 xGF% relative to team +1.7
50.0 Goals for % 36.4
102.0 PDO 94.5
60 Shot attempts taken 49
Expected goals, all situations
3.3 Expected goals 2.2
0.55 Expected goals per 60 0.48
7.4% Chance per attempt 5.2%
-1.3 Goals above expected +0.8
Rating, in goals
+0.6 Goals above replacement +0.2
+0.1 Wins above replacement +0.0
-2.0 Even-strength offence -1.3
+0.7 Even-strength defence +1.5
-0.1 Power play 0.0
+0.1 Penalty kill -0.1
+0.9 Penalties -0.6
Contract
$776K Cap hit $728K
$129K Cap dollars per point $121K
$1.2M Worth at the going rate $858K
+$375K Value: worth minus cap hit +$129K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean