Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Matthew Highmore Par Lindholm

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMatthew Highmore: Goals, 0.06 a game, 7th percentileMatthew Highmore: Assists, 0.11 a game, 16th percentileMatthew Highmore: Points, 0.17 a game, 8th percentileMatthew Highmore: Shots, 0.97 a game, 12th percentileMatthew Highmore: Hits, 1.06 a game, 54th percentileMatthew Highmore: Corsi for %, 47.6%, 21st percentileMatthew Highmore: CF% rel, -1.9, 24th percentileMatthew Highmore: On-ice xG %, 42.6%, 6th percentileMatthew Highmore: Rating, +0.6 goals above replacement, 26th percentileMatthew Highmore: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 13th percentileMatthew Highmore: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 27th percentileMatthew Highmore: Finishing, -1.3 goals above expected, 40th percentilePar Lindholm: Goals, 0.08 a game, 10th percentilePar Lindholm: Assists, 0.08 a game, 7th percentilePar Lindholm: Points, 0.15 a game, 6th percentilePar Lindholm: Shots, 0.88 a game, 7th percentilePar Lindholm: Hits, 0.58 a game, 26th percentilePar Lindholm: Corsi for %, 50.8%, 55th percentilePar Lindholm: CF% rel, 0.0, 44th percentilePar Lindholm: On-ice xG %, 56.7%, 94th percentilePar Lindholm: Rating, +2.9 goals above replacement, 55th percentilePar Lindholm: Chances created, 0.40 xG per 60, 1st percentilePar Lindholm: Shot quality, 6.0% a shot, 2nd percentilePar Lindholm: Finishing, +0.0 goals above expected, 56th percentile
02462040Matthew Highmore 6Par Lindholm 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Matthew Highmore
Par Lindholm

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Matthew Highmore C, OTT 2019-20 Par Lindholm C, BOS
36 Games played 40
2 Goals 3
4 Assists 3
6 Points 6
0.17 Points per game 0.15
-1 Plus/minus 6
35 Shots 35
5.7 Shooting % 8.6
38 Hits 23
6 Penalty minutes 4
9:49 Average ice time 11:15
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.6 Corsi for % 50.8
-1.9 CF% relative to team +0.0
45.3 Fenwick for % 50.8
42.6 Expected goals for % 56.7
-5.2 xGF% relative to team +4.1
50.0 Goals for % 71.4
102.0 PDO 103.1
60 Shot attempts taken 51
Expected goals, all situations
3.3 Expected goals 3.0
0.55 Expected goals per 60 0.40
7.4% Chance per attempt 6.0%
-1.3 Goals above expected +0.0
Rating, in goals
+0.6 Goals above replacement +2.9
+0.1 Wins above replacement +0.5
-2.0 Even-strength offence -2.2
+0.7 Even-strength defence +2.8
-0.1 Power play +0.3
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.3
+0.9 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$776K Cap hit $850K
$129K Cap dollars per point $142K
$1.2M Worth at the going rate $3.1M
+$375K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean