Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Kyle Connor Seth Griffith

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerKyle Connor: Goals, 0.10 a game, 26th percentileKyle Connor: Assists, 0.15 a game, 29th percentileKyle Connor: Points, 0.25 a game, 27th percentileKyle Connor: Shots, 1.20 a game, 26th percentileKyle Connor: Hits, 0.05 a game, 1st percentileKyle Connor: Corsi for %, 44.3%, 6th percentileKyle Connor: CF% rel, -5.2, 8th percentileKyle Connor: On-ice xG %, 39.6%, 1st percentileKyle Connor: Rating, -0.9 goals above replacement, 14th percentileKyle Connor: Chances created, 0.62 xG per 60, 28th percentileKyle Connor: Shot quality, 6.8% a shot, 23rd percentileKyle Connor: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 48th percentileSeth Griffith: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileSeth Griffith: Assists, 0.21 a game, 45th percentileSeth Griffith: Points, 0.21 a game, 19th percentileSeth Griffith: Shots, 0.88 a game, 10th percentileSeth Griffith: Hits, 1.25 a game, 64th percentileSeth Griffith: Corsi for %, 54.1%, 87th percentileSeth Griffith: CF% rel, 4.6, 90th percentileSeth Griffith: On-ice xG %, 55.0%, 87th percentileSeth Griffith: Rating, +1.8 goals above replacement, 40th percentileSeth Griffith: Chances created, 0.68 xG per 60, 43rd percentileSeth Griffith: Shot quality, 8.7% a shot, 81st percentileSeth Griffith: Finishing, -3.5 goals above expected, 17th percentile
01234520Kyle Connor 5Seth Griffith 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Kyle Connor
Seth Griffith

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Kyle Connor L, WPG 2016-17 Seth Griffith C, EDM
20 Games played 24
2 Goals 0
3 Assists 5
5 Points 5
0.25 Points per game 0.21
-7 Plus/minus 6
24 Shots 21
8.3 Shooting % 0.0
1 Hits 30
4 Penalty minutes 8
12:13 Average ice time 12:44
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.3 Corsi for % 54.1
-5.2 CF% relative to team +4.6
46.7 Fenwick for % 54.0
39.6 Expected goals for % 55.0
-13.1 xGF% relative to team +12.6
31.6 Goals for % 71.4
94.9 PDO 103.7
32 Shot attempts taken 39
Expected goals, all situations
2.5 Expected goals 3.5
0.62 Expected goals per 60 0.68
6.8% Chance per attempt 8.7%
-0.5 Goals above expected -3.5
Rating, in goals
-0.9 Goals above replacement +1.8
-0.2 Wins above replacement +0.3
-1.5 Even-strength offence +0.2
-0.4 Even-strength defence +0.7
+0.0 Power play +0.0
0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.3 Penalties +0.0
Contract
$925K Cap hit $625K
$185K Cap dollars per point $125K
-$20K Worth at the going rate $1.7M
-$945K Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean