Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Travis Dermott Mark Barberio

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTravis Dermott: Goals, 0.03 a game, 19th percentileTravis Dermott: Assists, 0.32 a game, 78th percentileTravis Dermott: Points, 0.35 a game, 68th percentileTravis Dermott: Shots, 1.46 a game, 56th percentileTravis Dermott: Hits, 1.30 a game, 54th percentileTravis Dermott: Corsi for %, 54.8%, 94th percentileTravis Dermott: CF% rel, 6.5, 99th percentileTravis Dermott: On-ice xG %, 56.5%, 96th percentileTravis Dermott: Rating, +5.8 goals above replacement, 81st percentileTravis Dermott: Chances created, 0.19 xG per 60, 46th percentileTravis Dermott: Shot quality, 2.7% a shot, 34th percentileTravis Dermott: Finishing, -0.9 goals above expected, 31st percentileMark Barberio: Goals, 0.07 a game, 53rd percentileMark Barberio: Assists, 0.22 a game, 55th percentileMark Barberio: Points, 0.28 a game, 54th percentileMark Barberio: Shots, 1.13 a game, 31st percentileMark Barberio: Hits, 0.57 a game, 14th percentileMark Barberio: Corsi for %, 49.5%, 48th percentileMark Barberio: CF% rel, 1.5, 73rd percentileMark Barberio: On-ice xG %, 49.6%, 48th percentileMark Barberio: Rating, +2.4 goals above replacement, 54th percentileMark Barberio: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 38th percentileMark Barberio: Shot quality, 2.9% a shot, 42nd percentileMark Barberio: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 40th percentile
05102040Travis Dermott 13Mark Barberio 13

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Travis Dermott
Mark Barberio

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Travis Dermott D, MIN 2017-18 Mark Barberio D, COL
37 Games played 46
1 Goals 3
12 Assists 10
13 Points 13
0.35 Points per game 0.28
16 Plus/minus 6
54 Shots 52
1.9 Shooting % 5.8
48 Hits 26
8 Penalty minutes 31
16:00 Average ice time 17:17
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
54.8 Corsi for % 49.5
+6.5 CF% relative to team +1.5
54.2 Fenwick for % 49.0
56.5 Expected goals for % 49.6
+8.8 xGF% relative to team +3.3
69.0 Goals for % 52.5
104.1 PDO 100.6
102 Shot attempts taken 119
Expected goals, all situations
1.9 Expected goals 2.4
0.19 Expected goals per 60 0.18
2.7% Chance per attempt 2.9%
-0.9 Goals above expected -0.4
Rating, in goals
+5.8 Goals above replacement +2.4
+1.0 Wins above replacement +0.4
+1.0 Even-strength offence +0.1
+2.1 Even-strength defence +1.3
0.0 Power play +0.1
+0.2 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.5 Penalties -1.7
Contract
$863K Cap hit $750K
$66K Cap dollars per point $58K
$4.3M Worth at the going rate $2.2M
+$3.5M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean