Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Daniel Sprong Sam Carrick

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDaniel Sprong: Goals, 0.13 a game, 31st percentileDaniel Sprong: Assists, 0.13 a game, 19th percentileDaniel Sprong: Points, 0.25 a game, 22nd percentileDaniel Sprong: Shots, 2.13 a game, 69th percentileDaniel Sprong: Hits, 0.50 a game, 19th percentileDaniel Sprong: Corsi for %, 55.8%, 95th percentileDaniel Sprong: CF% rel, 8.2, 99th percentileDaniel Sprong: On-ice xG %, 56.8%, 94th percentileDaniel Sprong: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 29th percentileDaniel Sprong: Chances created, 0.78 xG per 60, 52nd percentileDaniel Sprong: Shot quality, 5.9% a shot, 2nd percentileDaniel Sprong: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 49th percentileSam Carrick: Goals, 0.11 a game, 25th percentileSam Carrick: Assists, 0.11 a game, 16th percentileSam Carrick: Points, 0.22 a game, 17th percentileSam Carrick: Shots, 1.78 a game, 57th percentileSam Carrick: Hits, 1.44 a game, 72nd percentileSam Carrick: Corsi for %, 52.8%, 76th percentileSam Carrick: CF% rel, 6.6, 96th percentileSam Carrick: On-ice xG %, 50.1%, 47th percentileSam Carrick: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 30th percentileSam Carrick: Chances created, 0.59 xG per 60, 19th percentileSam Carrick: Shot quality, 5.3% a shot, 1st percentileSam Carrick: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 53rd percentile
00.511.52Daniel Sprong 2Sam Carrick 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Daniel Sprong
Sam Carrick

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Daniel Sprong R, NJD 2019-20 Sam Carrick C, BUF
8 Games played 9
1 Goals 1
1 Assists 1
2 Points 2
0.25 Points per game 0.22
-2 Plus/minus -3
17 Shots 16
5.9 Shooting % 6.3
4 Hits 13
0 Penalty minutes 0
14:06 Average ice time 13:46
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
55.8 Corsi for % 52.8
+8.2 CF% relative to team +6.6
57.7 Fenwick for % 54.5
56.8 Expected goals for % 50.1
+12.9 xGF% relative to team +10.1
50.0 Goals for % 40.0
98.7 PDO 93.7
25 Shot attempts taken 22
Expected goals, all situations
1.5 Expected goals 1.2
0.78 Expected goals per 60 0.59
5.9% Chance per attempt 5.3%
-0.5 Goals above expected -0.2
Rating, in goals
+0.8 Goals above replacement +0.8
+0.1 Wins above replacement +0.1
+0.3 Even-strength offence -0.5
-0.1 Even-strength defence +0.9
+0.1 Power play -0.1
0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.2 Penalties +0.2
Contract
$750K Cap hit $700K
$375K Cap dollars per point $350K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean