Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Daniel Sprong Tanner Kero

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDaniel Sprong: Goals, 0.25 a game, 72nd percentileDaniel Sprong: Assists, 0.13 a game, 21st percentileDaniel Sprong: Points, 0.38 a game, 43rd percentileDaniel Sprong: Shots, 2.75 a game, 88th percentileDaniel Sprong: Hits, 1.13 a game, 58th percentileDaniel Sprong: Corsi for %, 62.8%, 99th percentileDaniel Sprong: CF% rel, 10.7, 99th percentileDaniel Sprong: On-ice xG %, 77.4%, 99th percentileDaniel Sprong: Rating, +2.4 goals above replacement, 48th percentileDaniel Sprong: Chances created, 1.20 xG per 60, 97th percentileDaniel Sprong: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 45th percentileDaniel Sprong: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 50th percentileTanner Kero: Goals, 0.13 a game, 31st percentileTanner Kero: Assists, 0.25 a game, 54th percentileTanner Kero: Points, 0.38 a game, 43rd percentileTanner Kero: Shots, 0.88 a game, 8th percentileTanner Kero: Hits, 0.38 a game, 11th percentileTanner Kero: Corsi for %, 44.9%, 6th percentileTanner Kero: CF% rel, -4.9, 8th percentileTanner Kero: On-ice xG %, 51.8%, 65th percentileTanner Kero: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 33rd percentileTanner Kero: Chances created, 0.31 xG per 60, 1st percentileTanner Kero: Shot quality, 5.3% a shot, 1st percentileTanner Kero: Finishing, +0.5 goals above expected, 57th percentile
0123Daniel Sprong 3Tanner Kero 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Daniel Sprong
Tanner Kero

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Daniel Sprong R, NJD 2017-18 Tanner Kero C, DAL
8 Games played 8
2 Goals 1
1 Assists 2
3 Points 3
0.38 Points per game 0.38
2 Plus/minus 1
22 Shots 7
9.1 Shooting % 14.3
9 Hits 3
0 Penalty minutes 0
13:59 Average ice time 11:26
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
62.8 Corsi for % 44.9
+10.7 CF% relative to team -4.9
68.2 Fenwick for % 47.6
77.4 Expected goals for % 51.8
+26.5 xGF% relative to team +7.0
62.5 Goals for % 66.7
98.5 PDO 106.7
28 Shot attempts taken 9
Expected goals, all situations
2.2 Expected goals 0.5
1.20 Expected goals per 60 0.31
7.4% Chance per attempt 5.3%
-0.2 Goals above expected +0.5
Rating, in goals
+2.4 Goals above replacement +1.0
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.2
+0.6 Even-strength offence +0.1
+1.1 Even-strength defence +0.6
-0.2 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill -0.3
+0.5 Penalties +0.3
Contract
$693K Cap hit $750K
$231K Cap dollars per point $250K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean