Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Thomas Chabot Erik Johnson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerThomas Chabot: Goals, 0.14 a game, 88th percentileThomas Chabot: Assists, 0.25 a game, 65th percentileThomas Chabot: Points, 0.40 a game, 73rd percentileThomas Chabot: Shots, 1.49 a game, 58th percentileThomas Chabot: Hits, 0.70 a game, 20th percentileThomas Chabot: Corsi for %, 48.8%, 35th percentileThomas Chabot: CF% rel, 3.4, 84th percentileThomas Chabot: On-ice xG %, 46.0%, 15th percentileThomas Chabot: Rating, +4.2 goals above replacement, 71st percentileThomas Chabot: Chances created, 0.23 xG per 60, 67th percentileThomas Chabot: Shot quality, 3.7% a shot, 84th percentileThomas Chabot: Finishing, +4.8 goals above expected, 97th percentileErik Johnson: Goals, 0.15 a game, 89th percentileErik Johnson: Assists, 0.26 a game, 66th percentileErik Johnson: Points, 0.40 a game, 74th percentileErik Johnson: Shots, 2.71 a game, 94th percentileErik Johnson: Hits, 1.84 a game, 75th percentileErik Johnson: Corsi for %, 48.0%, 28th percentileErik Johnson: CF% rel, 0.5, 56th percentileErik Johnson: On-ice xG %, 48.8%, 40th percentileErik Johnson: Rating, +6.6 goals above replacement, 85th percentileErik Johnson: Chances created, 0.27 xG per 60, 78th percentileErik Johnson: Shot quality, 3.4% a shot, 68th percentileErik Johnson: Finishing, +1.0 goals above expected, 61st percentile
0510152025204060Thomas Chabot 25Erik Johnson 25

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Thomas Chabot
Erik Johnson

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Thomas Chabot D, OTT 2017-18 Erik Johnson D, COL
63 Games played 62
9 Goals 9
16 Assists 16
25 Points 25
0.40 Points per game 0.40
-12 Plus/minus 3
94 Shots 168
9.6 Shooting % 5.4
44 Hits 114
14 Penalty minutes 58
17:31 Average ice time 25:26
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.8 Corsi for % 48.0
+3.4 CF% relative to team +0.5
47.5 Fenwick for % 48.0
46.0 Expected goals for % 48.8
+2.3 xGF% relative to team +4.1
44.0 Goals for % 50.0
98.9 PDO 100.6
153 Shot attempts taken 224
Expected goals, all situations
4.2 Expected goals 7.0
0.23 Expected goals per 60 0.27
3.7% Chance per attempt 3.4%
+4.8 Goals above expected +1.0
Rating, in goals
+4.2 Goals above replacement +6.6
+0.7 Wins above replacement +1.1
+1.7 Even-strength offence +2.4
+0.0 Even-strength defence +2.1
-0.9 Power play -1.3
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.7
-0.4 Penalties -1.1
Contract
$863K Cap hit $6M
$35K Cap dollars per point $240K
$3.3M Worth at the going rate $4.8M
+$2.4M Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean