Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Joel Eriksson Ek Chris Wagner

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJoel Eriksson Ek: Goals, 0.08 a game, 13th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Assists, 0.13 a game, 22nd percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Points, 0.21 a game, 15th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Shots, 1.65 a game, 47th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Hits, 1.79 a game, 83rd percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Corsi for %, 47.7%, 23rd percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: CF% rel, 0.3, 53rd percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: On-ice xG %, 52.1%, 66th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Rating, +1.6 goals above replacement, 39th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Chances created, 0.59 xG per 60, 21st percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Shot quality, 6.1% a shot, 9th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Finishing, -4.4 goals above expected, 11th percentileChris Wagner: Goals, 0.09 a game, 18th percentileChris Wagner: Assists, 0.11 a game, 17th percentileChris Wagner: Points, 0.20 a game, 14th percentileChris Wagner: Shots, 1.18 a game, 22nd percentileChris Wagner: Hits, 3.20 a game, 99th percentileChris Wagner: Corsi for %, 44.6%, 6th percentileChris Wagner: CF% rel, -4.5, 10th percentileChris Wagner: On-ice xG %, 42.6%, 4th percentileChris Wagner: Rating, -2.3 goals above replacement, 4th percentileChris Wagner: Chances created, 0.56 xG per 60, 16th percentileChris Wagner: Shot quality, 7.2% a shot, 40th percentileChris Wagner: Finishing, -2.8 goals above expected, 25th percentile
051015204060Joel Eriksson Ek 16Chris Wagner 16

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Joel Eriksson Ek
Chris Wagner

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Joel Eriksson Ek C, MIN 2017-18 Chris Wagner R, COL
75 Games played 79
6 Goals 7
10 Assists 9
16 Points 16
0.21 Points per game 0.20
2 Plus/minus -10
124 Shots 93
4.8 Shooting % 7.5
134 Hits 253
22 Penalty minutes 37
12:47 Average ice time 13:17
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.7 Corsi for % 44.6
+0.3 CF% relative to team -4.5
49.6 Fenwick for % 44.5
52.1 Expected goals for % 42.6
-2.2 xGF% relative to team -7.3
48.9 Goals for % 36.4
99.1 PDO 98.1
178 Shot attempts taken 145
Expected goals, all situations
9.4 Expected goals 9.8
0.59 Expected goals per 60 0.56
6.1% Chance per attempt 7.2%
-4.4 Goals above expected -2.8
Rating, in goals
+1.6 Goals above replacement -2.3
+0.3 Wins above replacement -0.4
-3.9 Even-strength offence -4.5
+2.0 Even-strength defence -1.3
-0.1 Power play +0.5
+0.4 Penalty kill -0.6
+0.6 Penalties +0.8
Contract
$894K Cap hit $638K
$56K Cap dollars per point $40K
$1.7M Worth at the going rate -$855K
+$767K Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean