Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Joel Eriksson Ek Tyler Motte

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJoel Eriksson Ek: Goals, 0.20 a game, 61st percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Assists, 0.27 a game, 63rd percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Points, 0.47 a game, 61st percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Shots, 1.00 a game, 14th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Hits, 1.53 a game, 74th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Corsi for %, 41.7%, 2nd percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: CF% rel, -11.5, 1st percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: On-ice xG %, 42.5%, 5th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Rating, +0.0 goals above replacement, 23rd percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 9th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Shot quality, 5.8% a shot, 5th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Finishing, +1.7 goals above expected, 69th percentileTyler Motte: Goals, 0.12 a game, 32nd percentileTyler Motte: Assists, 0.09 a game, 16th percentileTyler Motte: Points, 0.21 a game, 20th percentileTyler Motte: Shots, 1.39 a game, 37th percentileTyler Motte: Hits, 0.82 a game, 40th percentileTyler Motte: Corsi for %, 43.3%, 4th percentileTyler Motte: CF% rel, -7.9, 3rd percentileTyler Motte: On-ice xG %, 42.0%, 4th percentileTyler Motte: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 25th percentileTyler Motte: Chances created, 0.62 xG per 60, 28th percentileTyler Motte: Shot quality, 6.6% a shot, 17th percentileTyler Motte: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 55th percentile
024620Joel Eriksson Ek 7Tyler Motte 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Joel Eriksson Ek
Tyler Motte

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Joel Eriksson Ek C, MIN 2016-17 Tyler Motte C, DET
15 Games played 33
3 Goals 4
4 Assists 3
7 Points 7
0.47 Points per game 0.21
1 Plus/minus 2
15 Shots 46
20.0 Shooting % 8.7
23 Hits 27
4 Penalty minutes 14
10:37 Average ice time 11:23
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
41.7 Corsi for % 43.3
-11.5 CF% relative to team -7.9
42.3 Fenwick for % 41.8
42.5 Expected goals for % 42.0
-16.2 xGF% relative to team -4.7
53.8 Goals for % 55.0
104.8 PDO 103.0
25 Shot attempts taken 74
Expected goals, all situations
1.3 Expected goals 3.9
0.48 Expected goals per 60 0.62
5.8% Chance per attempt 6.6%
+1.7 Goals above expected +0.1
Rating, in goals
+0.0 Goals above replacement +0.3
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.0
-0.1 Even-strength offence -0.1
-0.2 Even-strength defence -0.1
0.0 Power play -0.1
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.2
-0.1 Penalties -0.3
Contract
$894K Cap hit $925K
$128K Cap dollars per point $132K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean