Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Tanner Kero Tom Kuhnhackl

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTanner Kero: Goals, 0.13 a game, 35th percentileTanner Kero: Assists, 0.21 a game, 48th percentileTanner Kero: Points, 0.34 a game, 43rd percentileTanner Kero: Shots, 1.28 a game, 30th percentileTanner Kero: Hits, 0.87 a game, 43rd percentileTanner Kero: Corsi for %, 47.2%, 20th percentileTanner Kero: CF% rel, -4.4, 10th percentileTanner Kero: On-ice xG %, 50.8%, 56th percentileTanner Kero: Rating, +4.0 goals above replacement, 60th percentileTanner Kero: Chances created, 0.62 xG per 60, 27th percentileTanner Kero: Shot quality, 8.3% a shot, 72nd percentileTanner Kero: Finishing, -2.5 goals above expected, 26th percentileTom Kuhnhackl: Goals, 0.07 a game, 14th percentileTom Kuhnhackl: Assists, 0.21 a game, 47th percentileTom Kuhnhackl: Points, 0.28 a game, 31st percentileTom Kuhnhackl: Shots, 0.86 a game, 8th percentileTom Kuhnhackl: Hits, 1.96 a game, 85th percentileTom Kuhnhackl: Corsi for %, 46.3%, 15th percentileTom Kuhnhackl: CF% rel, -4.6, 9th percentileTom Kuhnhackl: On-ice xG %, 52.3%, 67th percentileTom Kuhnhackl: Rating, +2.1 goals above replacement, 43rd percentileTom Kuhnhackl: Chances created, 0.51 xG per 60, 11th percentileTom Kuhnhackl: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 34th percentileTom Kuhnhackl: Finishing, -2.1 goals above expected, 31st percentile
0510152040Tanner Kero 16Tom Kuhnhackl 16

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tanner Kero
Tom Kuhnhackl

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tanner Kero C, DAL 2016-17 Tom Kuhnhackl R, NYI
47 Games played 57
6 Goals 4
10 Assists 12
16 Points 16
0.34 Points per game 0.28
15 Plus/minus 8
60 Shots 49
10.0 Shooting % 8.2
41 Hits 112
8 Penalty minutes 18
13:29 Average ice time 10:39
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.2 Corsi for % 46.3
-4.4 CF% relative to team -4.6
49.7 Fenwick for % 49.3
50.8 Expected goals for % 52.3
+0.3 xGF% relative to team -0.4
61.0 Goals for % 57.6
103.1 PDO 102.7
93 Shot attempts taken 86
Expected goals, all situations
6.5 Expected goals 5.1
0.62 Expected goals per 60 0.51
8.3% Chance per attempt 7.1%
-2.5 Goals above expected -2.1
Rating, in goals
+4.0 Goals above replacement +2.1
+0.7 Wins above replacement +0.4
-0.3 Even-strength offence -2.0
+1.8 Even-strength defence +2.8
-0.1 Power play -0.1
-0.5 Penalty kill -0.7
+1.2 Penalties +0.4
Contract
$668K Cap hit $625K
$42K Cap dollars per point $39K
$3.1M Worth at the going rate $1.9M
+$2.4M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean