Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Tanner Kero Daniel Sprong

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTanner Kero: Goals, 0.13 a game, 31st percentileTanner Kero: Assists, 0.25 a game, 54th percentileTanner Kero: Points, 0.38 a game, 43rd percentileTanner Kero: Shots, 0.88 a game, 8th percentileTanner Kero: Hits, 0.38 a game, 11th percentileTanner Kero: Corsi for %, 44.9%, 6th percentileTanner Kero: CF% rel, -4.9, 8th percentileTanner Kero: On-ice xG %, 51.8%, 65th percentileTanner Kero: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 33rd percentileTanner Kero: Chances created, 0.31 xG per 60, 1st percentileTanner Kero: Shot quality, 5.3% a shot, 1st percentileTanner Kero: Finishing, +0.5 goals above expected, 57th percentileDaniel Sprong: Goals, 0.25 a game, 72nd percentileDaniel Sprong: Assists, 0.13 a game, 21st percentileDaniel Sprong: Points, 0.38 a game, 43rd percentileDaniel Sprong: Shots, 2.75 a game, 88th percentileDaniel Sprong: Hits, 1.13 a game, 58th percentileDaniel Sprong: Corsi for %, 62.8%, 99th percentileDaniel Sprong: CF% rel, 10.7, 99th percentileDaniel Sprong: On-ice xG %, 77.4%, 99th percentileDaniel Sprong: Rating, +2.4 goals above replacement, 48th percentileDaniel Sprong: Chances created, 1.20 xG per 60, 97th percentileDaniel Sprong: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 45th percentileDaniel Sprong: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 50th percentile
0123Tanner Kero 3Daniel Sprong 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tanner Kero
Daniel Sprong

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tanner Kero C, DAL 2017-18 Daniel Sprong R, NJD
8 Games played 8
1 Goals 2
2 Assists 1
3 Points 3
0.38 Points per game 0.38
1 Plus/minus 2
7 Shots 22
14.3 Shooting % 9.1
3 Hits 9
0 Penalty minutes 0
11:26 Average ice time 13:59
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.9 Corsi for % 62.8
-4.9 CF% relative to team +10.7
47.6 Fenwick for % 68.2
51.8 Expected goals for % 77.4
+7.0 xGF% relative to team +26.5
66.7 Goals for % 62.5
106.7 PDO 98.5
9 Shot attempts taken 28
Expected goals, all situations
0.5 Expected goals 2.2
0.31 Expected goals per 60 1.20
5.3% Chance per attempt 7.4%
+0.5 Goals above expected -0.2
Rating, in goals
+1.0 Goals above replacement +2.4
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.4
+0.1 Even-strength offence +0.6
+0.6 Even-strength defence +1.1
0.0 Power play -0.2
-0.3 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.3 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$750K Cap hit $693K
$250K Cap dollars per point $231K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean